Connect with us

Politics

US hurricanes followed by Republican storm of misinformation about relief efforts

Published

on

US President Joe Biden discussing Hurricane Milton and disaster relief efforts on Wednesday. Photo: EPA-EFE
Spread the love

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and supporters spread falsehoods about federal response and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris

Incessant rains and flooding battered Florida on Thursday after Hurricane Milton made landfall in the US as a Category 3 storm, leaving at least four dead and more than three million homes and businesses without power – two weeks after Hurricane Helene claimed more than 220 lives across six states, including Florida, North Carolina and Georgia.

Typically, US disaster relief is a bipartisan effort. But the back-to-back hurricanes have collided with this overheated election season, and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again allies have relentlessly criticised the federal response, propagating bizarre claims and unfounded conspiracy theories.

Trump has sought to leverage the grim situation to intensify his anti-immigration rhetoric while also labelling US President Joe Biden and Vice-President Kamala Harris – his Democratic rival for the White House – as “very irresponsive” to the crisis.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

“They have no money. You know where they gave the money? To illegal immigrants coming in,” Trump repeated during a rally in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, implying that the administration was spending disaster relief funds of the Federal Emergency Management Agency on immigrants.

The misinformation was so pervasive that Biden condemned Trump on Wednesday for his “reckless, irresponsible, relentless promotion of disinformation and outright lies that are disturbing people”.

“It’s ridiculous, and it’s got to stop,” Biden warned.

But it’s not just Trump. US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia known for spreading conspiracy theories, last week told her 1.2 million followers on X that the government “can control the weather”.

“It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done,” Greene, a staunch Trump supporter, added.

Even Republican officials in the affected areas have pushed back against the misinformation.

On September 30, Trump visited the swing state of Georgia, claiming that Brian Kemp, its Republican governor, had not been able to reach a “sleeping” Biden.

Kemp dismissed the allegation, saying he had spoken with the president the previous day and that Biden had offered whatever assistance Georgia might need.

And Greene was corrected by a colleague, US Representative Carlos Gimenez, a Republican from Florida, who said on Wednesday that she should get her “head examined”.

“Humans cannot create or control hurricanes,” Gimenez posted on X, as Hurricane Milton approached his state.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump with Georgia Governor Brian Kemp at a temporary relief shelter in Evans, Georgia, on October 4. Photo: AP

 

Several US media organisations fact-checked Trump’s allegations, finding no truth to them and noting that, in fact, it was the former president who tried to use Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) disaster funds in 2019 to pay for immigration programmes – in his case, detaining and transporting undocumented immigrants on the southern border.

According to CoreLogic, a data analysis consultancy, Hurricane Helene resulted in an estimated total loss of US$30.5 billion to US$47.5 billion; the losses from Hurricane Milton are still being assessed.

The disinformation has become so widespread that FEMA set up a response page on its website to debunk the lies, stating, for example, that it has “enough money right now for immediate response and recovery needs”.

No matter. In Michigan last week, Trump accused the Democrats of “stealing” money for “their illegal immigrants who they want to have vote for them”.

The billionaire Elon Musk, who is backing Trump and has campaigned with him, has used his social media platform X to amplify the disinformation.

“And FEMA used up its budget ferrying illegals into the country instead of saving American lives. Treason,” he wrote on his account, which has 201 million followers, without providing any evidence.

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1842121187461042217?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842121187461042217%7Ctwgr%5E2cb4cae8644a334efd6c5c56291eea36789a3ce0%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.scmp.com%2Fnews%2Fchina%2Farticle%2F3281925%2Fus-hurricanes-followed-republican-storm-misinformation-about-relief-efforts

He also shared a post that claimed FEMA was blocking victims of Helene from receiving payments in Republican areas.

Harris has countered Trump’s claims, positioning herself as a reliable leader in a crisis, in contrast to his tumultuous approach.

“There’s a lot of mis- and disinformation being pushed out there by the former president about what is available, in particular, to the survivors of Helene,” Harris said. on Monday, condemning Trump as “extraordinarily irresponsible”.

Over the past week, Harris has met with disaster victims, attended high-level briefings and connected with local officials in the affected areas.

However, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican who endorsed Trump following his brief presidential campaign earlier this year, said he had declined to take Harris’ calls.

“I’ve had storms under both President Trump and President Biden, and I’ve worked well with both of them,” he said, adding “she’s the first one who’s trying to politicise the storm, and she’s doing that just because of her campaign”.

The Harris campaign has also used the opportunity to highlight Trump’s climate denial, mocking him for calling climate change “one of the great scams of all time” in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene.

A woman walks past a large oak tree that fell at her apartment complex in Sanford, Florida, due to Hurricane Milton. Photo: AP

 

Trump has often called climate change a “hoax” and favoured ramping up oil and gas production.

In 2017, he pulled the US out of the Paris climate agreement, reached by over 200 countries two decades earlier to set targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Biden rejoined the accord in 2021.

Project 2025, a 900-page policy paper assembled by the conservative Heritage Foundation to guide the next Republican administration, proposes radical changes to federal disaster preparedness agencies.

The document contends that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees the government’s weather and research operations, should be “broken up and downsized” – claiming that the agency “is harmful to US prosperity” because it has “become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry”.

It also seeks to overhaul FEMA, shifting the majority of emergency responsibilities to state and local governments.

Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris (centre) walks with members of the US Armed Forces and North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper (left) after being briefed on Hurricane Helene recovery operations at the Charlotte Air National Guard Base on Saturday. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

Harris, who does not dispute the reality of climate change, released a campaign paper promising to “unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis”.

Other than disrupting voting preparations in the southern states of Georgia, North Carolina and Florida, the effect that the two natural disasters may have on the election, now four weeks away, is not clear.

A Gallup survey published on Wednesday found that just 21 per cent of voters identified climate change as a top priority, while immigration was among the top five issues cited as “extremely important” by 41 per cent of the respondents.

More Articles from SCMP

China’s stimulus measures just first step on economic reform journey

China moves to elevate and protect its private sector with new draft law

2 undercover Hong Kong security guards fired after Mannings shopper manhandled

‘Milestone’ for China’s gas turbine technology as it closes gap with the West

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), the leading news media reporting on China and Asia.

 

Politics

INEC announces date for Anambra Governorship Election

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced the date for the Anambra governorship election.

Addressing representatives of political parties at the INEC headquarters in Abuja on Thursday, October 17, INEC national chairman, Prof Mahmood Yakubu said the election will be held on Saturday 8th November 2025.

His words: “As you are aware, the last governorship election in Anambra State was held on 6th November 2021. By the effluxion of time, the governorship election is due next year.

“Consequently, the Commission has approved that the 2025 Anambra State Governorship election will hold on Saturday 8th November 2025.

“In compliance with the mandatory requirement of 360 days, the formal notice for the election will be published on 13th November 2024. Party primaries will be held from 20th March 2025 to 10th April 2025.

“The candidate nomination portal will open at 9.00 am on 18th April 2025 and close at 6.00 pm on 12th May 2025. The final list of candidates will be published on 9th June 2025.

“Campaign in public by political parties will commence on 11th June 2025 and end at midnight of Thursday 6th November 2025. Voting will take place in all the 5,720 Polling Units across the State on Saturday 8th November 2025.

“In the coming weeks, the Commission will provide details of other electoral activities, including the registration of new voters, transfer of voters and the replacement of lost or damaged PVCs.

“The detailed Timetable and Schedule of Activities for the 2025 Anambra State Governorship election will be uploaded to our website and social media platforms before the end of this meeting.”

Continue Reading

Politics

A path to Ukrainian peace: Beyond exaggerated expectations

Published

on

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, greets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, following a joint press conference in Kyiv, September 2024 Christoph Soeder/AP
Spread the love

The protracted, attritional war that Russia has waged against Ukraine for nearly three years has led analysts and political leaders alike to ponder how to end this war as soon as possible and achieve a lasting peace.

Increasingly, proposals are emerging to apply a model similar to the one implemented in Germany after World War II. Adapting to Ukraine would mean that it would never relinquish the annexed territories, and the West would never recognise these territories as Russian.

However, Ukraine would accept the reality that it cannot reclaim the occupied territories through force and would commit to a non-violent approach.

In exchange, Ukraine would demand concrete, not merely symbolic, security guarantees that Russia would not repeat its aggression against Ukraine.

Just recently, both Czech President Petr Pavel and outgoing NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg have expressed themselves along a similar vein. So, what is preventing the implementation of such a solution?

I would say that a problem lies in the exaggerated and unrealistic expectations held by Ukrainian citizens and a significant part of the democratic world.

This is a common phenomenon within the political sphere. Unrealistic expectations can be inadvertently cultivated not only by populists but also by well-intentioned politicians who make excessive promises to their constituents.

Such expectations pose a significant risk, not merely to the politicians who propagate them, but more importantly to the communities they represent, as these communities may find themselves on a perilous path with limited options for reversal.

Can we really make Putin kneel?

It appears that Ukraine has experienced precisely this phenomenon. The initial Ukrainian successes, including the defence of Kyiv against a blitzkrieg (a rapid invasion by Russian airborne troops at the outset of the war), the defence of Kharkiv, and the subsequent daring counteroffensive, led both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and parts of the West to experience euphoria and to foster expectations of a Ukrainian victory over Russia, with Western support.

These expectations included the notion of expelling Russian forces from all occupied territories, including Crimea.

Talk of the West’s vast economic and military superiority also contributed to the illusion that, eventually, Putin will kneel.

Russian soldiers guard a pier where two Ukrainian naval vessels are moored, in Sevastopol, March 2014 AP Photo

The West is also to blame for creating these exaggerated, unrealistic expectations. Some leaders hoped to persuade Putin to back down or at least suspend his operation. In the case of Ukraine, the granting of EU candidate status was considered by many to be something that was not even on the table.

Talk of the West’s vast economic and military superiority also contributed to the illusion that, eventually, Putin will kneel.

However, it seems to me that President Zelensky also made a key mistake by not involving the Ukrainian parliamentary opposition in solving the problem.

On the contrary, there have been reports here and there that Ukrainian border guards have not allowed the leader of the opposition, former President Petro Poroshenko, to leave Ukraine.

The mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko, has repeatedly expressed his criticism of the president. There are no known joint negotiations by the wider Ukrainian political leadership to seek a common solution to the key issues of the war.

I believe Zelenskyy should do this

And that’s how misinformation spreads. For example, the idea that these are various nationalist, if not outright fascist, units of Ukrainian fighters who are preventing President Zelenskyy from making any compromises.

In reality, it is the Ukrainian president himself who has manoeuvred himself into a position where the opposition will not proactively help him, and his voters will have a hard time understanding a potential change of approach to ending the war and thus will also have a hard time accepting any compromise.

He should invite the parliamentary opposition to the negotiating table, lay his cards on it and try to find a broad political consensus among Ukrainian leaders in an open discussion on the future arrangement of relations with Russia.

Therefore, I believe that the president of Ukraine should change his approach, first and foremost towards the representatives of the Ukrainian political opposition.

Instead of the pompous global peace summits that are doomed to failure in advance, instead of the “victory plans” that President Zelenskyy is presenting to world leaders (which, it seems, are just a new version of older demands), he should organise a peace summit at home, in Kyiv.

He should invite the parliamentary opposition to the negotiating table, lay his cards on it and try to find a broad political consensus among Ukrainian leaders in an open discussion on the future arrangement of relations with Russia.

Agreeing on necessary compromises

Undoubtedly, the price for such a change in approach could be a demand from the opposition to participate in the governance of Ukraine. There may also be other political demands.

In any case, the upside of such demands would be substantial: a broad political consensus among the Ukrainian political elite, which would begin to address Ukrainian citizens in a common, unified language.

Only in this way is it possible to agree to the compromises that are necessary to end the war and establish a sustainable peace. At the same time, these compromises in no way mean capitulation or resignation to a part of Ukrainian territory.

Mikuláš Dzurinda is president of Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, the EPP-affiliated think-tank, and former prime minister of Slovakia.

Continue Reading

Politics

Bill to create new state passes second reading in House of Reps

Published

on

Spread the love

 

A bill to create Ogoja State from Cross River has successfully passed its second reading in the House of Representatives.

Co-sponsored by Godwin Offiono and three other lawmakers, the proposal seeks to amend the 1999 constitution to carve out a new state in the South-South region.

Moving the motion, Mr Offiono said the “essence of this bill is rested on equity.”

The bill progressed after a voice vote led by Speaker Tajudeen Abbas during Thursday’s plenary session.

It has now been forwarded to the committee on constitutional review for further action.

The national assembly is actively working on constitutional amendments, including the creation of new states.

Since Nigeria’s return to democratic governance in 1999, no new state has been created.

Continue Reading

Trending