News
Assign Nnamdi Kanu’s case to another judge or transfer to South-East – IPOB lawyers write CJN
The legal team of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has approached the Chief Justice of the Federation, Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, to prevail on the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja, Justice John Tsoho, to reassign his case or transfer it to the South-East.
Kanu’s trial commenced in 2015 and was pending trial before Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako of the Abuja Federal High Court until 24th September, 2024, when the judge pursuant to the request of the IPOB leader recused herself from presiding over the trial.
Nyako also entered and enrolled an Order of recusal thereof after stepping down.
In a letter addressed to Kekere-Ekun dated February 19, 2025, Kanu’s lead Counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, said: “Despite the foregoing, the Complainant wrote to the Court on 5th December 2024, requesting that the case be re-listed for trial before the recused Judge (i.e Honourable Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako). In our reaction, we countered with a reply, opposing the re-listing or reassignment of the case to the same Judge because the order of recusal – being extant and subsisting – legally barred His Lordship from presiding over the trial or has otherwise ousted the jurisdiction of that particular Court.”
The letter obtained by Ekwutosblog , titled, ‘Request for your lordship’s intervention in FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015 (Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu)’, added: “We have approached the Chief Justice of the Federation to intervene with the Chief Judge of Federal High Court on the matter of proper reassignment of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case to another Judge in Abuja or to transfer the case to South-East, where the offenses allegedly occurred and where all of our witnesses are located.
“We are Solicitors-of-Record to the Defendant (Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) in the above-referenced case pending before the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court. The said Defendant may hereafter be referred as our Client or the Defendant.
“The purpose of this communication is to most respectfully request Your Lordship’s prompt administrative intervention, directing the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to abide by the law and assign this case for trial to a Court that possesses the requisite jurisdiction.
“In total disregard of the incontrovertible facts enunciated above, the Honourable Chief Judge proceeded to reassign this case for trial before the same Judge who stands recused by the said order of recusal; and on 10th February 2025, our Client was summoned to appear for trial before the same Judge.
“Upon the receipt of the hearing notice, we wrote a Letter to the Honorable Chief Judge, protesting the reassignment of the case to the said recused Judge and, in the alternative, requesting for transfer of the case to the South-East (prompted by credible information at our disposal indicating that no other Judge in the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court is willing to take the case, in addition to the fact that South-East is the place where the offenses were alleged to have had impact).
“In the meantime, the Defendant had – on 14th January 2025 – filed a Complaint against the said recused Judge before the National Judicial Council and the said Complaint is still pending.
“Despite the foregoing, the said Honourable Judge neither responded to our said letter nor reassigned the case to a Judge other than the said Judge that was recused. Thus, on the said 10th February 2025, we – out of our abiding respect for the sanctity of the court – appeared under protest before the recused Judge, whereupon the said court (sans jurisdiction) entered an order of adjournment sine die.
“Your Lordship, for avoidance of doubt, we are minded to respectfully call Your Lordship’s attention to the following, which are on point:
“In Okoduwa v. State (1988) NWLR (Pt. 76) 333, the Supreme Court held that a Judge’s withdrawal from a case due to allegations of bias renders any subsequent involvement in the same case improper. Similarly, in Rashidi v. Ministry of Health (1990) 2 NWLR (Pt. 133) 324, the court emphasized that judicial integrity requires that recusal decisions be final unless properly reviewed.
“This apex court has pronounced in a plethora of cases that a Judge who has demonstrated bias or is perceived to be biased ought to recuse himself. This stare decis was emphasized in Deduwa v. Okorodudu (1976) 10 SC 329, in which the Supreme Court held that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. And to be sure, recusal of a Judge is anchored on the constitutional right to a fair hearing as provided under Section 36(1) of the Nigerian Constitution which guarantees the right of our Client to be heard by an impartial tribunal.
“Thus, once a judge voluntarily recuses himself, the immediate legal consequence is that such a Judge is disqualified from further proceedings in the matter. In plain terms, decision or an Order of recusal is akin to a decision on jurisdiction which cannot be reversed arbitrarily. In order words, a subsequent formal order (made with jurisdiction) – not a mere internal memo – is strictly required. In Ogboru V. Ibori (2005) 13 NWLR (Pt. 942) 319, it was pronounced that: “.. it is settled law that once a Court has delivered its decision on a matter, it becomes functus officio with regard to that matter. What this means is that a Court cannot sit as an appellate Court over its decision; once it has decided a matter, it ceases to be seised of it, and it cannot re-open it for any purpose whatsoever.”
“To be sure, public perception and the integrity of the judiciary are at stake in this case. A Judge’s unilateral return to a case after recusal will surely create a public perception of partiality, thus eroding the much-cherished public confidence in the courts.
“Your Lordship, it is thus on the basis of the foregoing that we were left with no other choice than to bring this matter before Your Lordship, praying that Your Lordship invoke your administrative powers as the head of the judiciary in Nigeria to halt this gross miscarriage to the Defendant and direct the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to reassign this case to another Judge in the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court or any of the Divisions in South-East Nigeria.”
News
EFCC Arrests Herbalists with $3.4million, €280, 000 Counterfeit Notes in Osun, Lagos
Operatives of the Ibadan Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, have uncovered huge counterfeit foreign notes to the tune of $3, 430, 000 (Three Million, Four Hundred and Thirty Thousand United States Dollars) and €280, 000 (Two Hundred and Eighty Thousand Euros) in possession of a five-member syndicate arrested for allegedly swindling one Halima Sanni the sum of N26, 550, 000 (Twenty-Six Million, Five Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira).
The herbalists: Akingbola Omotayo, Adeola Funsho Ogunrinde, Yahaya Amodu, Kubratu Babalola Olaitan (female) and Familola Sunday Olaitan. were arrested on December 7 and 8, 2025 at their shrines in Osun and Lagos States respectively, following a thorough surveillance and intelligence on their fraudulent activities
Investigation revealed that the suspects were allegedly defrauding unsuspecting individuals of their legitimate earnings under the pretence of providing spiritual cleansing and solutions to different ailments.
They also allegedly assured their victims of their powers to conjure several currency notes which must be cleaned up by a genie through spiritual sacrifice before spending the money. They did all these by hypnotizing their victims to provide money for the sacrifice.
Other items recovered from them include two exotic cars and mobile phones.
The suspects will be charged to court as soon as investigations are concluded.

News
HAPPENING NOW: US Air Force Takes Over Benin-Nigeria Border Airspace, Wipes Out ISWAP Terrorists’ Armory
Without taking chances, the United States Air Force entered the airspace of Benin-Nigeria border without using the Nigerian airport, stepped up reconnaissance and massive attack against militants and it had begun the operation now in blasting the armory of the terrorists.
According to Standard Newspaper Inc USA, Corroborating this view, Bryant Philip, a top American security operative with specialty in West Africa law enforcement confirmed the latest development by explaining that the United States Air Force ISR aircraft is on an on-going mission above
His words: “The United States Air Force ISR aircraft is currently operating above the Babana strategic crossing on the Benin-Nigeria border. This route has long been used by armed groups, particularly JNIM, for smuggling supplies. In August, the Nigerian army clashed with unidentified gunmen.

“The United States resumes ISR missions today in Nigeria, targeting ISWAP zones of influence in Borno State, northeast Nigeria, on the fringes of Lake Chad. It took off from Accra, Ghana. Still not using a Nigerian airport.”
Meanwhile, the Nigerian Army Elite Group, Maroon Beret famously described as Boko Haram’s nightmare stormed the secret enclave of the terrorists’ group and killed over 50 members of the notorious sect inside their make-shift huts in the forest.

As at press time, some 200 West African soldiers, mainly from Nigeria and Ivory Coast, are in Benin Republic to support the government following the failed coup, Benin’s foreign minister says.
Remember, the attempt was foiled after Nigeria deployed fighter jets to drive the mutineers out of a military base and state TV headquarters, where they had declared a takeover.
This is the first time that officials have said how many foreign soldiers were deployed to the country, although it is not clear if some have been withdrawn.

Benin’s Foreign Affairs Minister Olushegun Adjadi Bakari on Thursday said some of the regional troops sent to help had remained in the country “as part of the sweep and clean-up operation”.
The West African regional bloc, ECOWAS, deployed troops from Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Ivory Coast to secure key installations and prevent any resurgence of the violence.
Nigeria, Benin’s large neighbour to the east, said its soldiers had reached there since a few days ago, describing the coup attempt as a “direct assault on democracy”.
Security intelligence showed 50 soldiers from the country had been sent as part of the regional deployment.
“There are currently around 200 soldiers present, who came to lend a hand at the end of the day to the Beninese defence and security forces as part of the sweep and clean-up operation,” said Bakari, while addressing journalists in Nigeria’s capital, Abuja, on Thursday.
Bakari, who was speaking alongside Nigeria’s Foreign Affairs Minister Yusuf Maitama Tuggar, said that by the time the Beninese forces called for help, the coup “was already a failure”.
“When we started discussions for the intervention of Nigeria and the others, under ECOWAS protocol, our military had already pushed them back,” he added.
According to Bakari, what was required was “precise aerial back-up to carry out a surgical operation that targeted the enemy’s key positions without risking civilian casualties”.
Tuggar said that fast diplomatic, military, and intelligence actions between Nigeria and Benin had helped to foil the coup.
Discussions are continuing over how long the regional forces would remain, but Bakari said any decision “will be taken in close collaboration with Benin’s defence and security forces, who have demonstrated their bravery”.
It is not clear if the French special forces who also reportedly helped loyalist troops thwart the coup are still in Benin.
Under intense pressure after a string of successful coups in the region, Ecowas is signaling that it is no longer willing to watch democratically elected governments be toppled by the military.
Bakari praised ECOWAS as “an important tool that allows us to defend democracy and the values of democracy in our regional space”.
News
What Buhari did when he heard rumors that I planned to kill him – Aisha
Former First Lady Aisha Buhari has disclosed that her late husband, former President Muhammadu Buhari, locked himself inside his room after believing rumors within Aso Rock that she planned to kill him.
The revelation was contained in a new biography titled From Soldier to Statesman: The Legacy of Muhammadu Buhari, written by Dr Charles Omole and launched at the State House on Monday, December 16, 2025.
The book follows Buhari’s life journey from his early years in Daura, Katsina State, to his final days in a London hospital in mid-July 2025.
According to the account, Aisha Buhari said gossip and fear inside the Presidential Villa created tension that affected her husband’s daily life.
She stated that for about a week, Buhari believed the rumours, became cautious, changed his habits, and started locking his room.
During this period, his meals were delayed or missed, and the supplements he depended on were stopped.
She explained that this disruption marked the beginning of the health crisis that later forced Buhari to take long medical leave in 2017.
She maintained that the illness was not caused by poisoning or any hidden disease but by the breakdown of a feeding and nutrition routine she had managed for years.
The book stated that Aisha Buhari had always supervised her husband’s meals and supplements at fixed times, even before he became president.
She described Buhari as someone with a long history of nutrition-related weakness who depended on a strict routine to stay strong.
After moving into Aso Villa, she reportedly met with close aides, including security and medical officials, to explain the importance of the plan.
However, the routine gradually collapsed. Aisha Buhari said that for nearly a year, her husband stopped eating lunch and his meals were poorly managed.
His condition worsened and led to two extended medical trips to the United Kingdom in 2017, lasting a total of 154 days. During his absence, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo handled presidential duties.
After returning to Nigeria, Buhari admitted that he had never been that ill before and confirmed receiving blood transfusions.
The book said that his prolonged absence led to widespread rumours and speculation across the country.
Aisha Buhari rejected claims that there were attempts to poison her husband, insisting that the real cause of the crisis was the loss of his nutrition routine.
In London, doctors placed Buhari on a stronger supplement plan.
At first, he was afraid and reluctant to take them, but she took charge of his care and ensured he received the prescribed supplements through his meals.
She described the recovery as rapid, saying that within days Buhari no longer needed support to walk and soon began receiving visitors.
The book stated that this marked both the beginning and the end of the illness.
Dr Omole also addressed criticism over Buhari’s repeated medical treatment abroad, saying that an elderly man in his seventies may require specialised care not easily available in Nigeria due to years of weak investment in healthcare.
He added that Buhari’s habit of formally handing over power during absences showed respect for due process.
The book further described an atmosphere of mistrust around the Presidency. Aisha Buhari alleged that the President’s office was monitored and private conversations replayed, adding that fear within the system affected his wellbeing. She also dismissed claims that Buhari had a body double, describing the story as false and blaming poor communication for allowing such rumors to grow.
-
Business1 year ago
US court acquits Air Peace boss, slams Mayfield $4000 fine
-
Trending1 year agoNYA demands release of ‘abducted’ Imo chairman, preaches good governance
-
Politics1 year agoMexico’s new president causes concern just weeks before the US elections
-
Politics1 year agoPutin invites 20 world leaders
-
Politics1 year agoRussia bans imports of agro-products from Kazakhstan after refusal to join BRICS
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky falls ill in police custody, rushed to hospital
-
Entertainment1 year ago
Bobrisky transferred from Immigration to FCID, spends night behind bars
-
Education1 year ago
GOVERNOR FUBARA APPOINTS COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR KEN SARO-WIWA POLYTECHNIC BORI
