Connect with us

Politics

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor calls US deportation of Indians in military plane “quite unnecessary”

Published

on

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor (Photo/ANI) © Provided by Asian News International (ANI)
Spread the love

New Delhi [India], February 6 (ANI): As a USmilitary aircraft carrying more than 100 Indian citizens who allegedly illegally migrated to the US arrived in Amritsar on Wednesday, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said that the US has the right to deport a person if they are staying there illegally.

However, he stated that the manner in which the US was deporting Indian citizens was “unnecessary” as they were not criminals and had no bad intentions.

Speaking to ANI, Tharoor said that the US should have deported Indians on a commercial aircraft or a civilian plane. He stressed that deportation should have been conducted in a more “humane manner.” He also highlighted that over 1100 Indians were deported under the Biden administration in 2024.

On the US deportation of Indian citizens who allegedly illegally migrated to the US, Shashi Tharoor said, “It’s not the first time we’ve had people deported. It’s just that the media has suddenly woken up to the story because Mr Trump has done it perhaps a bit quicker than people expected, but already last year under the Biden administration where over 1100 Indians were being deported back. If you’re illegally in the US, the US has a right to deport you, and if your identity as an Indian is confirmed India has an obligation to accept you. So, in both cases, there really isn’t very much debate. However, it wasn’t good to hear that they were brought back forcibly in the military plane and handcuffed and so on, that was quite unnecessary.”

“It should have been enough to either put them on a commercial aircraft or a civilian plane and send them back. You can, if you want to do a mass deportation, do civilian charters, that would have been the more humane thing to do. They may, strictly speaking, have broken your laws by coming into your country, but by and large, they have no bad intentions. They’re not criminals. They’re not convicted of anything else. They’re there to make a better life for themselves which they have done by violating your laws. So, you can send them out, no problem, but handcuffing them and putting them in a military aircraft and sending them in this way, I think India should say that this is not entirely advisable,” he added.

A US Air Force plane carrying Indian citizens who allegedly illegally migrated to the US arrived in Punjab’s Amritsar on Wednesday. Earlier on Tuesday, a US Embassy spokesperson said that while specific details cannot be shared, the United States is vigorously enforcing its border and immigration laws. The spokesperson emphasised that the actions taken send a “clear message that illegal migration is not worth the risk.”

Congress MP said that he had asked for an immigration bill when he was the chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs from 2014-2019 and stressed that the bill was required as the existing immigration bill in India is 1983 and called it out of date. He said that deportation of illegal migrants is just one of the immigration bill.

Asked whether the Ministry of External Affairs(MEA) has given any response to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs on the law for safe immigration, Shashi Tharoor said, “First of all, you know, what goes on in the committee is not supposed to be discussed publicly, but I should say, That the question of an immigration bill has been public knowledge for several years. When I chaired the committee from 2014 to 2019, I had asked for an immigration bill because the existing immigration bill in India is 1983 and it’s grossly out of date. It has not done anything to take into account the realities of immigration in the last 40 years and therefore an updated bill was necessary. It needs to take into account the various challenges that we have that have arisen in recent years that we have seen.”

“Deportation of illegal migrants is only one part of it, but safe and orderly and legal migration, migration of guest workers with the right to come back, migration of people for permanent settlement, migration of those going, for example, to countries like the Gulf where they’re taken in bulk by contract labourers, what are their rights? What are the privileges, what are the duties of the embassies and all these places? There are a number of issues. It’s not a small matter. And the government has been promising us a bill since 2016, 2015 or 2016 when Sushma Swaraj ji had written to me confirming that they were working on a bill. It is now almost 9 years and there is still no bill in sight, so it is widely known that the committee and members of the committee have been demanding that this be expedited. They have promised that within a fairly short period of time, there will be a bill that will be presented for public consultations after interministerial consultation, and I have urged that we should all be taken into confidence on how this is being discussed. But, it’s not, specifically linked to the current problem of deportation alone, it’s an old issue,” he added.

Shashi Tharoor said that he has read interviews with a couple of people who claimed they were handcuffed. He stressed that US should not treat Indians like that and called it “totally unacceptable.

On being asked about reports that Indian migrants were sent back handcuffed, he said, “Well, people say they’ve seen pictures. I personally have not. I had a busy day yesterday. I didn’t see any of the footage, but if it is true, and I’ve certainly read interviews with a couple of people who claimed they were handcuffed, then it is really unacceptable. There is no need to treat Indians like this. They are citizens. They have a right to be in their own country with dignity, yes, they should not have broken the law, but handcuffing them on the way back, I think it’s totally unnecessary, and, and this kind of thing, to be honest, is what gives, I think the whole process of deportation such a bad name. Some Latin American countries have made it very clear they will not accept military aircraft and they will not accept handcuffing and Indiashould I think take a similar stand.”

When asked about his response on mob vandalising the residence of Bangladesh’s founding leader, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, in Dhaka, Shashi Tharoor said, “It’s tragic that these things are happening, obviously. Bangladesh can turn around and say this is our internal affair, it’s none of your business, and I accept that. But, having said that, it’s also true that there are some decencies we would like to see our neighbours honour, and this was a gentleman with an enormous contribution to Bangladeshi history which cannot be wished away whether you disagree with him or his party or his daughter politically. It is truly I think shameful that such a thing would have happened and if it is true because I’ve not seen any pictures again, but if you, you’ve got confirmation this has happened, I think it would have beenpity, but I also feel that India as a foreign country can only express its own regrets that such a thing happening. It has no business to complain to the Bangladeshis because it genuinely is not our business.”

The protesters, reportedly demanding a ban on the Awami League, stormed the premises after breaking open the gate, causing widespread destruction, Dhaka Tribune reported, citing UNB. Local media linked the protest to an online speech by former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. (ANI)

Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info

Politics

Rivers: Court adjourns suit challenging appointment of LG administrators

Published

on

Spread the love

The Federal High Court sitting in Port Harcourt has adjourned to May 22, 2025, the hearing of a suit seeking to bar Rivers State Sole Administrator, Ibok-Ete Ibas, from appointing local government administrators across the 23 Local Government Areas of the state.

The claimant, Oyingi Imiete, at the resumed hearing, told the court that the matter was scheduled for hearing of a motion for interlocutory injunction.

Imiete, however, revealed that the respondent had already appointed sole administrators for all 23 LGAs on April 9, 2025, allegedly after receiving the court’s order and originating processes in the suit.

He explained that service was effected by the court bailiff on the same day as the appointments.

“The matter came up for motion. The applicant’s motion and they said the motion was withdrawn by the applicant.

“The applicants had equally put in the motion for mandatory restorative order and it equally has been fixed for hearing because the actions of the respondent have greatly affected the subject matter before the court,” the claimant said.

Responding, counsel for the defendant argued that the originating processes were not served until two days after the appointments and supported the claimant’s decision to withdraw the motion, calling the appointments a completed act.

He added that his client had not yet been served the new motion and reserved the right to respond when properly served.

Both parties agreed to proceed with a substantive hearing of the originating summons.

The court stressed that despite perceived frivolity, all applications must be heard and stated that the facts and issues remain within the purview of the parties.

The case was subsequently adjourned to May 22, 2025, for further hearing.

The suit, filed by the PILEX Centre for Civic Education Initiative and its coordinator Courage Nsirimovu, seeks to stop the administrator from making such appointments, which the plaintiffs argue are unconstitutional and violate the principles of democratic governance.

Justice Adamu Turaki Mohammed, on April 7, granted an interim injunction barring Ibas from proceeding with the appointments and summoned him to appear before the court to explain why the injunction should not be made permanent.

However, the Sole Administrator went ahead to make the appointments, which drew criticisms from civil society organizations.

Continue Reading

Politics

We don’t want to depend on China in case of war – Trump

Published

on

Spread the love

President Donald Trump has said more products need to be produced in the United States, so it is prepared in case of “war.”

There are fears of a recession around the world with Trump’s crackdown on imports.

It is believed to be part of his plan to ramp up domestic manufacturing and have more goods made in America.

In his latest explanation of the tariff policy, Trump claimed it was necessary to deal with any future war.

Trump made the comments on Air Force One while talking about possible pharmaceutical tariffs on Sunday.

He said: “We’re going to have our drugs made in the United States.

“So that in case of war, in case of whatever, we’re not relying on China and various other countries, which is not a good idea.”

Trump put a 90-day pause on many of his on-again, off-again reciprocal tariffs, but left in place a 145% import tax on goods from China.

In response, Beijing suspended exports of certain rare earth minerals and magnets that are crucial for the world’s car, semiconductor and aerospace industries.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ebonyi state Lawmaker Demands Restoration Of Abakaliki Street that was changed to Club road In Awka

Published

on

Spread the love



‎The Member Representing Ikwo/Ezza South Federal Constituency, Chinedu Ogah has called for the restoration of Abakaliki Street in Anambra State to promote unity and oneness among the two states.

‎Abakaliki street in Awka was changed to Club Road by Anambra State Government.

Chinedu ‎Ogah who is the Chairman, House Committee on Correctional Services urged Governor Chukwuma Soludo to immediately restore Abakaliki Street in the state, warning that failure to do so, may make Ebonyi State to start changing all streets in Abakaliki to Ebonyi names and villages.

‎He noted that Anambra has over 100 streets in Ebonyi State and wondered why the only street named after Ebonyi State should be changed in Anambra.

Chinedu ‎Ogah said Ebonyi State has been so kind to Anambra people by accommodating them in all aspects of life including elective positions and other areas, whereas Ebonyi people living in Anambra have not been treated fairly in that state.

‎”Professor Chukwuma Soludo should readdress the issue of changing Abakaliki Street to Club Street in Anambra. If he fails to do this, it will make Ebonyi people to change all the names of Anambra streets in Ebonyi State”

‎“In Abakaliki, Ebonyi State capital, we have Awka Street, Onitsha Street, Ekwulumili Street, Ekwulobia Street, Aforezuna Street and many others, and they have not been changed.

‎“Anambra has over 100 streets in Abakaliki but the only one street named after Abakaliki in Anambra State has been changed. Governor Soludo should change his decision immediately. If he doesn’t do so, we will start renaming the streets we named Anambra to our own names and our villages.

Continue Reading

Trending