Connect with us

Politics

Former Gov: Any Governor Complaining About Insecurity to the FG is Either Lying or Incompetent.

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Ekwutosblog has gathered that Former Governor of Niger State, Babangida Aliyu, has sharply criticized his fellow governors who place the blame for security challenges in their states squarely on the Federal Government.

Speaking at the graduation ceremony for the Executive Intelligence Management Course 17 at the National Institute for Security Studies in Abuja, Aliyu emphasized that no competent governor should “cry” to the center for help whenever there are security concerns within their jurisdiction. His remarks come amidst growing security concerns in several Nigerian states, where governors have often appealed for federal intervention.

Aliyu argued that governors must take responsibility for security within their states, as they have access to resources and intelligence reports that can help mitigate security threats. “No competent governor should cry to the center anytime there is a security challenge,” he stated, adding that governors are in a position to take proactive steps to address insecurity on their own. He further questioned the actions of governors, particularly regarding how they utilized the security votes allocated to them and how seriously they acted upon security reports from agencies like the Department of State Services (DSS).

The former governor shared his own experience during his tenure as the governor of Niger State, where he said he closely worked with the DSS. He revealed that he personally reviewed security reports daily, and that the DSS played a crucial role in his administration’s ability to tackle security threats, especially banditry. Aliyu credited the DSS with advising him to hire a helicopter to patrol the state’s borders, a recommendation that he followed and found to be effective in combating insecurity. His message to governors was clear: “If any governor complains to you that he’s not in charge of security, he’s either a liar incompetent or does not know what he’s doing.”

Aliyu also pointed to the misuse of security votes as a potential issue. He asked, “Why the security votes? Where does it go if you have to complain to the federal government?” Security votes are funds allocated to state governors to assist in the maintenance of security, and Aliyu implied that if governors are still blaming the federal government despite receiving these funds, it suggests a lack of accountability or proper utilization of resources. He highlighted that during his time as the chairman of the Northern Governors Forum, some governors failed to take responsibility, even going so far as to delegate security matters to others. He urged governors to take security seriously by engaging directly with their security agencies, reading reports, and acting decisively.

In addition to his comments on security, Aliyu also weighed in on the Tax Reform Bills that have sparked debate in Nigeria. He took aim at critics of the reforms, many of whom, according to him, had not taken the time to read the details of the bills. Aliyu called for a more thorough public understanding of such policies, criticizing both the lack of proper communication by the government and the general ignorance surrounding the reforms.

He pointed out that some of the opposition to the tax reforms could be due to a failure by the government to adequately explain the policy and its potential benefits to the public. He stressed that “the government should speak more,” especially since a large portion of Nigeria’s population may not have access to full information about new policies due to literacy challenges.

Aliyu’s remarks underscore a broader critique of leadership and governance in Nigeria, particularly regarding the responsibilities of state governors in ensuring the safety and welfare of their citizens. His comments also touch on the importance of transparency, accountability, and communication, urging government officials to take ownership of their roles rather than shifting the blame onto others.

 

Politics

FG Sets Aside ₦27bn For Obasanjo, Gowon, Buhari, Others In 2025

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The Federal Government has allocated ₦27 billion for the entitlements of former presidents, vice presidents, heads of state, chiefs of staff, retired heads of service, and professors in the 2025 fiscal year.

The beneficiaries of this allocation include former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari, alongside ex-vice-presidents Atiku Abubakar, Namadi Sambo, and Prof. Yemi Osinbajo. Other notable individuals expected to benefit from this allocation are ex-military Heads of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (retd.) and Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar (retd.), as well as former military President, Ibrahim Babangida, and retired Chief of General Staff, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe.

It can be recalled that President Bola Tinubu on Wednesday presented the 2025 budget, titled ‘Budget of Restoration: Securing Peace, Rebuilding Prosperity,’ to a joint session of the National Assembly. The ₦49.70 trillion spending plan prioritizes defence, infrastructure, and human capital development, with a projected ₦13.39 trillion deficit to be financed through borrowing.

The Federal Government has allocated ₦1.4 trillion for pensions, gratuities, and retirees’ benefits. This allocation includes ₦2.3 billion for former presidents, heads of state, and vice presidents. Retired heads of service and permanent secretaries will receive ₦10.5 billion, while retired professors in universities will get ₦13.5 billion. Additionally, ₦1 billion has been allocated for retired heads of government agencies and parastatals. The total allocation for these groups amounts to ₦27 billion.

Furthermore, the budget allocates ₦46 billion for civilian pensions under the Office of the Head of Civil Service, while ₦383.9 billion is earmarked for military pensions and gratuities. An additional ₦66.8 billion is budgeted for expected retirees, with ₦434 million allocated for administrative charges, ₦596 million for pension running costs, and ₦870 million for medical retirees.

The Federal Government has also set aside funds for various social investment programs, including the student loan scheme, National Poverty Reduction with Growth Strategy programs, National Home Grown School Feeding Programme, and the Consumer Credit Fund initiatives. A total of ₦500 billion has been allocated for these programs, with ₦50 billion specifically earmarked for the student loan scheme.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tinubu Is Not Our Problem In North; We Ruled Nigeria For 40 Years But Nothing To Show – Ex-Speaker Yakubu Dogara

Published

on

Spread the love

Tinubu Is Not Our Problem In North; We Ruled Nigeria For 40 Years But Nothing To Show – Ex-Speaker Yakubu Dogara

North Remains The Same, Impoverished Despite Ruling Nigeria For Over 40-Years, Says Dogara.

“We are all northerners, and it should be made clear that President Tinubu or the South is not our problem. They have not come to cheat the North. That is out of the question.

“Some are claiming that Yoruba people are getting appointments, but let’s reflect. We ruled this country for over 40-years when northerners were in power. What did we achieve? The North remains the same, impoverished by our own leaders.

“We have had so much, but what did our governors do with the resources? They squandered them instead of investing in meaningful development.” -Yakubu Dogara, At A Townhall Meeting In Kaduna On Tax Reforms

Continue Reading

Politics

Vladimir Putin challenges US, western powers to shoot down powerful new Russian missile: “No chance”

Published

on

Spread the love
  • Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed a “high-technology duel” with the US to test the Oreshnik, Russia’s advanced hypersonic ballistic missile
  • The Oreshnik missile, capable of speeds up to 8,500 mph and carrying nuclear warheads, has already been deployed in Ukraine, targeting Dnipro
  • Putin challenged the US to select a target for a live demonstration, claiming Western missile defences would fail against Russia’s new weapon
  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky dismissed the challenge, questioning Putin’s rationality

Didacus Malowa, a journalist at TUKO.co.ke, brings over three years of experience covering politics and current affairs in Kenya.

Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has issued a direct challenge to the United States.

Putin proposed a “high-technology duel” to test the effectiveness of Russia’s latest hypersonic ballistic missile, the Oreshnik.

The head of state made the proposition during his annual end-of-year press conference, a platform he often uses to assert Russia’s strength.

Military.com reports the Oreshnik missile, named after the Russian word for hazel tree, is an advanced intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads.

It reportedly reaches speeds up to 8,500 miles per hour, making it a formidable addition to Russia’s arsenal.

What is Putin’s challenge to US and allies

Putin’s challenge involves the US selecting a target to defend, against which Russia would launch the Oreshnik on Kyiv to demonstrate its ability to penetrate advanced missile defence systems.

“We’re ready for such an experiment,” expressing confidence that Western technology “stands no chance” against this new weapon.

In November, Russia deployed the Oreshnik against a military facility in Dnipro, Ukraine, marking its first known use in combat.

This action was framed as retaliation for Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied missiles, such as the US ATACMS and British Storm Shadow, in strikes against Russian territories.

How did Ukraine respond to Putin

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky responded to Putin’s challenge, questioning the rationality of such a proposal.

“Do you think he is a sane person?” Zelenskyy posed to reporters at his latest news conference as reported by Al Jazeera.

He went on to say that Ukraine and Russia had failed to strike an agreement during early-war discussions in Istanbul.

This comes after Putin stated that a tentative deal agreed by Russian and Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul during the early weeks of the war may serve as the foundation for future conversations.

“Ukraine did not agree to the ultimatum from the Russian Federation. Ukraine did not sign anything, no agreements existed. There was a response to the ultimatum from the Russian Federation,” he declared.

Continue Reading

Trending