Connect with us

Politics

How North Korea is changing Russia’s war in Ukraine

Published

on

Russia's President Vladimir Putin (L) and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un (R) are strengthening their ties © Vladimir Smirnov/POOL/TASS/dpa/picture alliance
Spread the love

Signs are mounting that North Korean soldiers are fighting on Russia’s side in Ukraine. Kyiv is already talking about a new war party. In what ways could heightened North Korean-Russian ties affect the war?

 

In June, Russian President Vladimir Putin traveled to Pyongyang to discuss a security partnership with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Prior to this, there had been rumors of extensive North Korean arms deliveries to Russia. And as early as 2023, the Ukrainian military intelligence had reported that a limited North Korean military contingent had arrived in the Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine.

Now, latest findings by South Korean national intelligence service (NIS) indicate that the North Korean-Russian ties have reached new heights.

North Korean soldiers in Russia

According to a report published last Friday, Pyongyang wants to provide up to 12,000 soldiersfor Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Of these, 1,500 were said to have already disembarked in the Russian port city of Vladivostok. Meanwhile, the NIS has upped this number to around 3,000 soldiers.

It would appear that North Korean soldiers are to be issued Russian uniforms in order to conceal their identity. DW’s fact-checking team was able to confirm that the footage provided by the NIS shows locations in Russia’s eastern military districts.

Neither Russia nor North Korea have yet officially confirmed the findings.

“At the moment, there is little concrete information and a lot of vague speculation,” Nico Lange, a senior fellow at the Munich Security Conference, told DW.

“But there is no doubt that North Koreans are in Russia for training,” he added. “And there is also no doubt that for some time now (…) construction units of the North Korean armed forces have been active in the occupied territories in Ukraine.”

And yet, he also cautions not to draw the conclusion that 12,000 North Korean soldiers were now fighting in Russian trenches across Ukraine. “That’s not what we’ve been observing so far,” he said.

As of now, neither North Korean leader Kim Jong Un nor Russia’s President Vladimir Putin have confirmed shipments of weapons or the deployment of soldiers.
© Vladimir Smirnov/POOL/TASS/dpa/picture alliance

 

Western restraint

From a Ukrainian perspective, however, all of this is still a concerning development.

While Russia’s head of state Putin presented himself as a respectable host at the BRICS summit this week, Kyiv is growing increasingly worried over waning support for Ukraine.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s “victory plan” has so far failed to gain traction. Furthermore, Ukraine fears that Republican nominee Donald Trump, who wants to cut arms aid and recently blamed the Ukrainian president for Russia’s invasion, will win the US presidential election in early November.

As of now, it remains to be seen in what way the US will handle an escalation in Russia’s war in Ukraine. Washington is, after all, not only the biggest supporter of Ukraine, but also a protective power for South Korea.

The US was the first NATO member to refer to “evidence” of the presence of North Korean troops in Russia. But beyond that, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has kept rather quiet.

The North Korean-Russian ties will likely be an issue for the upcoming US administration — whether under Republican or Democratic leadership.

Lange believes that Europe is waiting to see what the outcome of the US elections will be.

“At the moment, I don’t see the major European states coming together to develop a common strategy: What do we want to achieve in Ukraine? How will we deal with Russia and Russia’s supporters? How can we achieve this together? That’s what we’d need,” he said.

South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) confirmed that North Korea has decided to send troops to Russia
© Sopa/Sipa/picture alliance

 

Europe’s failure

On Wednesday, NATO spokesperson Farah Dakhallah in Brussels told DW that if North Korean troops were indeed designated to fight in Ukraine, “it would mark a significant escalation in North Korea’s support for Russia’s illegal war and yet another sign of Russia’s significant losses on the front lines.” She added that the alliance was actively consulting on the matter.

According to Roderich Kiesewetter of the German Christian Democratic Union, Germany’s largest opposition party in the Bundestag, it was a “fatal omission” that Europe had not yet reacted to North Korea’s suspected troop deployment.

A united and decisive reaction of strength and deterrence is absolutely necessary, he told DW. “Many European countries have wanted this for a long time,” he added. Germany also had to alter its stance, he said, by reducing range restrictions on delivered weapons, providing more weapons systems to Ukraine, and issuing an invitation to join the NATO alliance.

Meanwhile, Berlin’s Federal Foreign Office summoned North Korea’s chargé d’affaires on Wednesday. In the meeting, Berlin made clear that supporting Russia’s war of aggression posed a threat to German security and peace in Europe.

Temporary ties

Earlier in October, when the indications of deeper Russian-North Korean cooperation began to intensify, DW spoke to Andrei Lankov, a professor at Kookmin University in Seoul.

“Russia may benefit from this to avoid mobilization,” he told DW, adding that “if you look at it from the Russian point of view, [Russian President Vladimir] Putin is fighting a war that is generally popular in Russia, but only on the one condition that the majority of the population is kept out of the fighting and is not ‘disturbed’ from its day-to-day life by the war.”

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has sworn to cut back foreign spending, which would affect Ukraine’s war efforts against Russia
© Shannon Stapleton/REUTERS

 

In his view, fewer and fewer men in Russia are prepared to put their lives on the line, even for financial benefits such as those offered in army contracts.

North Korea, on the other hands, wants money and technology for sending its soldiers.

“Right now, a private in the Russian military gets $2,000 (€1850) a month plus a signing-on bonus that can be as much as $20,000 (€18,500). If North Korea gets half of that figure for every soldier it provides, then Pyongyang will be very happy,” Lankov said.

Furthermore, North Korea is eyeing Russia’s modern technology.

“Under different circumstances, Russia would never be willing to share technology with such an unstable country, but now it has no other choice,” Lankov added.

However, in his view, this cooperation is not meant to last. Instead, after the end of the war in Ukraine, Lankov expected relations to return to their previous level, as North Korea ceases to be of economic interest to Moscow.

Rayna Breuer contributed to this article, which was translated from German.

Author: David Ehl, Julian Ryall

Politics

US says it will not limit arms transfers to Israel after some aid improvements to Gaza

Published

on

Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli strike in the courtyard of the Al-Aqsa Hospital where displaced people live in tents, in Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Nov. 9, 2024 © Abdel Kareem Hana/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved.
Spread the love

The Biden administration said on Tuesday that Israel made good but limited progress in increasing the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza, and that it therefore would not limit arms transfers to Israel as it threatened to do a month ago.

However, relief groups say conditions are worse than at any point in the 13-month-old war.

State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said on Tuesday the progress to date must be supplemented and sustained but that “we at this time have not made an assessment that the Israelis are in violation of US law.”

This law requires recipients of military assistance to adhere to international humanitarian law and not impede the provision of such aid.

“We are not giving Israel a pass,” Patel said, adding that “we want to see the totality of the humanitarian situation improve, and we think some of these steps will allow the conditions for that to continue progress.”

The decision from the U.S. — Israel’s key ally and largest provider of arms and other military aid — comes despite international aid organizations declaring that Israel has failed to meet U.S. demands to allow greater humanitarian access to the Gaza Strip. Hunger experts have warned that the north may already be experiencing famine.

The Biden administration last month set a deadline expiring Tuesday for Israel to “surge” more food and other emergency aid into the Palestinian territory or risk the possibility of scaled-back military support as Israel wages offensives against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

 The obstacles facing aid distribution were on this display this week. Even after the Israeli military gave permission for a delivery to the northernmost part of Gaza — virtually cut off from food for more than a month by an Israeli siege — the United Nations said it couldn’t deliver most of it because of turmoil and restrictions from Israeli troops on the ground.

In the south, hundreds of truckloads of aid are sitting on the Gaza side of the border because the U.N. says it cannot reach them to distribute the aid — again because of the threat of lawlessness, theft and Israeli military restrictions.

Israel has announced a series of steps — though their effect was unclear. On Tuesday, it opened a new crossing in central Gaza, outside the city of Deir al-Balah, for aid to enter.

It also announced a small expansion of its coastal “humanitarian zone,” where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are sheltering in tent camps. It connected electricity for a desalination plant in Deir al-Balah.

Eight international aid organizations, meanwhile, said in a report Tuesday that “Israel not only failed to meet the U.S. criteria” but also took actions “that dramatically worsened the situation on the ground, particularly in Northern Gaza. … That situation is in an even more dire state today than a month ago.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Constituents push for Senator’s recall over alleged involvement in banditry

Published

on

Senator Shehu Umar Buba represents Bauchi South Senatorial District under the All Progressives Congress (APC). [Facebook] ©(c) provided by Pulse Nigeria © Pulse Nigeria
Spread the love

The Senator’s recent appointment as Chairman of the Senate Committee on National Security and Intelligence has attracted fierce criticism.

Senator Shehu Buba, representing Bauchi State’s South Senatorial District, is facing intense scrutiny and backlash following allegations linking him to terror suspects in Northern Nigeria.

The Department of State Services (DSS) is investigating his potential involvement with wanted terrorists, while his constituents are mobilising for a historic recall.

Buba, once a respected figure in Bauchi politics, is under fire after being connected to Abubakar Idris, a known terrorist arrested in August 2024.

Idris’s arrest reportedly implicated Buba, sparking outrage among his constituents, who are demanding accountability and the senator’s removal.

READ ALSO: US told to issue visa ban to Nigerian Senator linked to terror suspect

A formal recall process has been initiated, with registered voters in his district pushing for a referendum to remove him from office.

“This is a matter of national security. We cannot have someone with such affiliations in office,” one constituent declared, according to reports.

The recall movement is gaining momentum as more people sign a petition to trigger the process. If successful, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will be required to conduct a referendum, potentially marking the first time a sitting senator is removed by his constituents.

Buba’s woes deepened with revelations about his origins. Despite claiming to represent Bauchi, investigations show he hails from Plateau State, raising questions about his legitimacy.

An anonymous community leader expressed frustration, stating, “We thought he was one of us, but he’s not even a Bauchi indigene.”

READ ALSO: Senator Buba fires back at Bauchi Gov over banditry allegation

Buba’s political rise has been controversial. After moving to Bauchi in 2001, he built connections through family ties and political maneuvering, eventually securing a position as the Caretaker Chairman of Toro Local Government.

His success in politics, including his controversial senatorial nomination in 2022, has raised doubts about his integrity. Critics argue that his rise was influenced by powerful figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Bauchi Governor Isa Yuguda.

Buba’s recent appointment as Chairman of the Senate Committee on National Security and Intelligence has attracted fierce criticism. Political analysts argue that it is dangerous to have someone with such alleged links to terrorism overseeing national security matters.

“This is a grave error,” one analyst stated. “It’s a dangerous gamble to have him in charge of national security.”

With growing discontent, Buba has been noticeably absent from public events, fueling speculation that he is avoiding the backlash from his constituents. His dwindling visibility only adds to the tension, as many believe he is distancing himself from the growing outrage.

Continue Reading

Politics

Europe wants to strike Russia

Published

on

Europe wants to strike Russia © Pixabay
Spread the love

The European Union should directly use $300 billion of frozen Russian assets to finance the recovery of war-torn Ukraine, according to Kaja Kallas, the candidate for the EU’s top foreign policy post.

Ms. Kallas, the former Estonian prime minister nominated for the post of EU high representative, said member states should abandon any doubts about the direct use of these assets, citing Kiev’s “legitimate claims” on these funds, following Russia’s invasion.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Ukraine knew how to use Russia’s frozen assets. He proposed transferring the entire $300 billion to Kiev. “Frankly, these are Ukrainian funds,” he said.

According to World Bank estimates, by the end of 2023, Ukraine’s total economic, social and financial losses due to the war will amount to $499 billion.

Continue Reading

Trending