Connect with us

Politics

PDP shifts NEC meeting over state congress crisis

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Some members of the Peoples Democratic Party’s National Working Committee have faulted the further postponement of the party’s 99th National Executive Committee meeting to October 24.

According to the party chieftains who spoke to newsmen, the postponement of the NEC meeting from the earlier date of September 26 to March 24 is a deliberate move to undermine the party’s engagement on crucial issues.

The PDP 99th NEC meeting, initially scheduled for August 15 to discuss issues such as the replacement of the PDP acting National Chairman, Umar Damagum, was first postponed to September 26 due to members travelling to Saudi Arabia for pilgrimage.

On September 13, it was reported that the meeting was again rescheduled to October 24.

The party’s leadership, in a document sighted by our correspondent, explained that the postponement became inevitable due to unresolved congresses in eight states.

But the chieftains who spoke to newsmen dismissed the reason adduced for the NEC meeting postponement.

In a document dated September 16, the PDP National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu, explained that the NEC meeting was moved to October 24 to ensure that the congress reports from eight states were complete and could be presented to the NEC as required.

The PDP National Secretary stated that the party would hold congresses in Abia and Ebonyi on a date yet to be announced, while ongoing congresses were taking place in Benue, Ekiti, Kano, Kaduna, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, and Sokoto.

The statement read, “Furthermore, pursuant to the directive of NEC to conduct congresses in 24 state chapters of the party, the NWC commenced the congresses but could not conclude the exercise in some states owing to various reasons, ranging from litigation, disagreement among stakeholders, logistical challenges, among others. States where congresses are yet to be concluded due to litigation are Abia and Ebonyi, while those still ongoing are Benue, Ekiti, Kano, Kaduna, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, and Sokoto.

“It is instructive to state that without concluding the congresses in these states, congress reports would not be complete to be presented to NEC as required within the earlier stipulated timeframe.

“In view of the foregoing, it is therefore imperative for the NWC to reschedule the September 26, 2024, proposed NEC meeting to a new date. Consequently, the NWC wishes to notify all members of the National Executive Committee of our party that the 99th NEC meeting will now be held on Thursday, October 24.”

A senior NWC member, who requested anonymity due to lack of authorization to discuss the issue, disclosed that many members were dissatisfied with the recent rescheduling. The source claimed that the postponement was intended to serve specific interests rather than the broader interests of the party.

He said, “This latest postponement of the NEC to October 24 did not sit well with our members. They were already prepared for the September 26 meeting to address and resolve issues affecting the party.

“It is unfortunate that this postponement was made to protect certain interests rather than the interests of the entire party. The claim that the postponement was due to litigation delaying the conduct of congresses in eight states is not credible. We wonder if it is feasible to resolve all litigation within a month. What if the litigation remains unresolved? In that case, they would likely reschedule again. The appropriate course of action would have been to hold the meeting and update the NEC on the situation, as litigation could take months and might lead to further delays.”

PDP Deputy National Youth Leader, Timothy Osadolor, similarly expressed his opposition to the postponement.

In an interview with newsmen, Osadolor acknowledged that while the reasons for the delay were legitimate, he believed it was intentionally done to frustrate members.

He stated, “The truth is that it is an open secret that there are challenges in some states and the congresses could not be held. However, this does not mean that it is not a deliberate attempt to frustrate party members who are coming to the meeting to address critical issues.

“The reasons for this postponement are cogent and largely unassailable. However, all issues affecting the party need to be resolved as soon as possible.

“Regardless, I am not in support of the further postponement of this meeting. There is an urgent need for party leaders to sit down and resolve all issues so that the party can move forward. All is not well with the party, and the NEC is the most important organ for resolving these issues.”

Politics

BREAKING: The PDP North East Zone Endorses Damagum as National Chair – Adamawa Governor, Fintiri.

Published

on

Spread the love

 

In a statement released today by Chief Press Secretary to the Governor Fintiri

He said, “The People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Adamawa, Taraba, Gombe, Borno, and Yobe states have endorsed Ambassador Umar Iliya Damagum’s leadership as Acting National Chairman.

“Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, speaking on behalf of the five states, expressed confidence in Damagum’s leadership since assuming office. Citing a Federal High Court Abuja restraining order, Fintiri stated that Damagum should complete former Chairman Dr. Iyorchia Ayu’s tenure unless the court decides otherwise.

“The Governor praised Damagum for restoring public confidence in the party and urged members to respect the court’s ruling for the party’s and democracy’s sake.

“The Governor who described the performance of the party in the North East region during the 2023 elections as unprecedented at all levels noted that the zone deserves the position of National Chairman more than any section in the North.

“A Federal High Court in Abuja had barred the National Working Committee, Board of Trustees, National Executive Committee, PDP, INEC, and affiliates from replacing, nominating or appointing any Chairman other than Ambassador Damagum, following a restraining order by the Court.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato, Boris Johnson urges

Published

on

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato 'now', Boris Johnson (left) has urged. Mr Johnson is pictured shaking hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (right) in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Friday, September 13, 2024
Spread the love

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato ‘now’, Boris Johnson has urged.

The former prime minister has said the move would be the ‘single biggest step’ the West could take to end Russia‘s war.

He admitted the United States and its allies would be alarmed about Ukraine joining the military alliance while fighting was ongoing.

It would mean all 32 Nato member states would have to commit to Ukraine’s defence.

But writing in today’s ­Spectator, he argues: ‘The risk is that we continue with the ambiguity and indecision over the future of Ukraine that has led to the worst war in Europe in my lifetime.

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato ‘now’, Boris Johnson (left) has urged. Mr Johnson is pictured shaking hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (right) in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Friday, September 13, 2024

 

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (right) said after a summit in Washington in July that Nato had ‘confirmed Ukraine’s irreversible path to full membership’. Yet earlier this year, US President Joe Biden (left) said he was ‘not prepared to support the Nato-isation of Ukraine’. Sir Keir and President Biden are pictured together at the summit in DC on July 10, 2024

 

‘If we want peace, then we must put the Ukrainians in the strongest possible position, and this is how to do it.’

Ukraine has long sought membership of Nato and gained ‘aspiring member’ ­status in 2018, four years after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, but not all western leaders have been enthusiastic.

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky stepped up the demand in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s invasion in early 2022. However, at a summit last year Nato leaders said Ukraine could join only once it had completed ‘democratic and security sector reforms‘.

At the time, Mr Johnson said there should have been a timetable for membership ‘as soon as victory is won’. Now the former foreign secretary goes further, arguing: ‘We could invite Ukraine to join before the war is even over.’

‘We need to get Ukraine into Nato now, and I mean now,’ he writes. He suggests the critical Article 5 security guarantee – which means an attack on one Nato member is seen as an attack on all – could be extended to cover territory currently controlled by Kyiv, while allies should also reaffirm the country’s right to its borders.

‘We could protect most of Ukraine, while simultaneously supporting the Ukrainian right to recapture the rest,’ Mr Johnson writes, adding: ‘This is the single biggest step we can take to bring this hideous war to an end.

‘We would send the crucial message to the Kremlin, the one Russians really need to hear. The message is: that’s it. It’s over. You don’t have an empire any more.’

A Ukrainian tank of the 110th brigade moves through a field as it returns from a position at the frontline on Pokrovsk direction, Donetsk region, Ukraine on Wednesday, September 18, 2024

 

A heavily damaged and partially destroyed house following a Russian attack on the village of Komyshuvakha in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya region on September 17, 2024

 

He admits the decision depends above all on the US. Sir Keir Starmer said after a summit in Washington in July that Nato had ‘confirmed Ukraine’s irreversible path to full membership’.

Yet earlier this year, US President Joe Biden said he was ‘not prepared to support the Nato-isation of Ukraine’.

Mr Johnson adds: ‘We would all have to commit to the defence of that Ukrainian territory. And of course that will mean anxiety and resistance.’

He also renewed his call for Mr Biden and the Prime Minister to allow Ukraine to fire western Storm Shadow missiles into Russian territory, after talks last week between the pair failed to lead to a breakthrough.

Read more

Continue Reading

Politics

Russia’s ambassador hauled into the Foreign Office

Published

on

Andrey Kelin, Russia's ambassador to the UK, was hauled into the Foreign Office today over 'malicious and completely baseless' claims against British diplomats in Moscow
Spread the love

Russia’s ambassador to the UK was hauled into the Foreign Office today over ‘malicious and completely baseless’ claims against British diplomats in Moscow.

The Kremlin last week announced the expulsion of six Foreign Office staff from Russia and claimed to have evidence they were engaged in spying and sabotage.

The move ratcheted up tensions between Londonand Moscow as Sir Keir Starmer prepared to meet Joe Biden in Washington DC.

The PM and US President held talks on giving the go-ahead for Ukraine to use long-range missiles, including Britain’s Storm Shadow weapons, against targets in Russia.

The Foreign Office immediately rejected the claims by Russia’s FSB security agency against its staff in Moscow and today announced the summoning of Russian ambassador Andrey Kelin.

It said the action was taken in response to Moscow’s ‘malicious and deliberate public campaign of aggression against the UK’.

Andrey Kelin, Russia’s ambassador to the UK, was hauled into the Foreign Office today over ‘malicious and completely baseless’ claims against British diplomats in Moscow

 

The Foreign Office said the action was taken in response to Moscow’s ‘malicious and deliberate public campaign of aggression against the UK’

 

A Foreign Office spokesperson said: ‘The UK condemns in the strongest terms Russia’s unprecedented and unfounded public campaign of aggression against the UK, including the malicious and completely baseless accusations made against Foreign Office staff last week.

‘This behaviour is in direct contravention to Russia’s obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

‘This pattern of behaviour is completely unacceptable, deeply unprofessional, and beneath the standards of conduct between states.

‘This is the latest development in a deliberate campaign by Russia to undermine and threaten UK security and democracy and deter our support for Ukraine, through disinformation, acts of sabotage in Europe and direct harassment and restrictions against our diplomatic missions in Russia.

‘This campaign will not succeed. Russia must stop this activity immediately.’

The expulsion of six UK diplomats from Moscow is the latest in a series of diplomatic rows between Britain and Russia over the past year.

In May, the UK expelled Russia’s defence attache in London, Colonel Maxim Elovik, claiming he was an ‘undeclared military intelligence officer’, removed diplomatic status from several Russian-owned premises, and placed restrictions on Russian diplomatic visas.

In response, Russia expelled Britain’s defence attache in Moscow, Captain Adrian Coghill.

Despite Sir Keir and Mr Biden’s talks last week, no decision has yet been reached on giving Ukraine permission to use long-range missiles to target Russian airfields and military bases.

Read more

Continue Reading

Trending