Connect with us

Politics

PREEMPTIVE ANALYSIS OF STAKEHOLDERS RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE ONCOMING 2024 IMO STATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTION AND ACCENTUATING THE CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONS OF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCIL- A NEW NORMAL IS POSSIBLE!

Published

on

Hope UZODINMA
Spread the love

 

Prof. Nnamdi Obiaraeri

The oncoming Local Government Council election in Imo State to be conducted by the Imo State Independent Electoral Commission (abbreviated as “ISIEC”) is unarguably a right and commendable step towards returning democratic rule in the Local Government system in Imo State. This trajectory is however inevitable and inescapable given the radical and far reaching implications of the recent 11 July 2024 judgment of the Supreme Court in the Local Government Autonomy Case (A-G FEDERATION v A-G ABIA STATE & 35 ORS) proclaiming that the system of local government by democratically elected Local Government Councils guaranteed under section 7 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended must be scrupulously obeyed.

Before the euphoria of the scheduled Local Government election in Imo State overshadows the grim realities on ground, it is important do five significant things ahead of time namely- to charge political parties to conduct free, fair and credible primary election; to charge the ISIEC to conduct free, fair and credible inter party Local Government election; to underscore the compelling need for Imo electorates to elect only highly qualified, credible, competent and capable men and women to be in charge of the affairs of the Local Government Councils and Legislative Councils; to remind the Imo State Judiciary to set up impartial Local Government Election Tribunal that will expeditiously dispose post-election petitions; and to accentuate the constitutional functions of Local Government Areas.

There are 27 Local Government Areas and 305 INEC Wards in Imo State. Barring last minute changes, the ISIEC is expected to conduct election to elect 27 Local Government Area Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen and 305 Wards Councilors on 21 September 2024. Hence, all stakeholders in the proposed election are being reminded of their respective duties and responsibilities in a nutshell in this intervention.

For the political parties, the concept of internal party democracy will demand that political parties desiring to sponsor candidates in the scheduled Local Government election in Imo State should be able to conduct free, fair and credible party primary elections to select their Chairmanship and Councillorship candidates. Though, political parties in Nigeria are not known to conduct free and fair primary elections, they are reminded to have a change of character beginning from the Imo State Local Government election. Imposition of candidates by party big wigs after collecting huge sums of money for expression of interest/nomination forms from countless aspirants is not only undemocratic but immoral and wicked. Political parties are reminded that the quality of candidates they sponsor in an election invariably affects the quality of candidates left for voters to choose from. It is garbage in, garbage out (GIGO) where there is little or nothing for the voter to choose from the run-of-the-mill candidates sponsored by parties in an election. Leadership debacle in Nigeria stems from poor leadership recruitment process beginning from skewed party primary elections that favour mediocrity over merit. Nigerian political parties can afford to do better although it is difficult to ask Nigerian politicians not to see politics a roguish business.

For the electoral umpire being the State Independent Electoral Commission established under section 197(1)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended, they are mandated under the constitution to be “independent” in order to be able to conduct free, fair and credible State based elections. It is public knowledge that the words or terms “independent”, “free”, “fair” and “credible” and whatever they truly denote in reference to elections are alien to Nigeria’s electoral jurisprudence. Whether conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (often abbreviated as “INEC”) or by the respective State Independent Electoral Commission, elections in Nigeria are notoriously a “do or die” affair and always less than credible. Overtime, and across the different States in the country, elections conducted by State Independent Electoral Commissions into Local Government Councils have become synonymous with “CARRY GO” syndrome where the ruling party in the very State will sweep all seats contested regardless of the sanctity of lawful majority votes cast. It is against this disreputable background that public expectation is very high on the part of the Imo State Independent Electoral Commission to inject a paradigm shift by conducting a Local Government Council election in Imo State that will be seen and adjudged to be free, fair and credible. This appears to be a tall order but it can be done and should be done by the ISIEC. Votes of Imo electorates must not only be transparently counted, the counted votes must count. Anything short of this is a fail grade!

On the part of the electorates in Imo State, they are enjoined to eschew violence and elect only candidates that are highly qualified, competent and capable to be put in charge of affairs as Executive Chairmen/Vice Chairmen and Ward Councilors in the respective Local Government Councils. Only patriotic, responsible and responsive candidates who are altruistic and not beholden to “godfathers” or “godmothers” should be elected. So far, the quality of persons showing interest as aspirants in the Chairmanship and Councillorship seats are encouraging. Only time will tell whether, on being elected, they will deliver the dividends of democracy or whether they will characteristically turn to become impervious to wise counsel, inaccessible (“eze onye agwalam”), disconnected from the people and their needs, greedy, corrupt and rapacious. Imo people expect that when elected, these officials will remain responsible and responsive for the job ahead is enormous as the constitutional functions of the Local Government Councils are humungous.

As the approaching Local Government election is a very serious inter party contest, post-election disputes are bound to occur. As a corollary, it is expected that the Chief Judge of Imo State will constitute Local Government Election Tribunals to enable aggrieved political parties and or their candidates timeously file their post-election petitions and receive appropriate redress as allowed under the rule of law. The Nigerian Constitution is founded on the rule of law the primary meaning of which is that everything must be done according to law. The judiciary cannot shirk its constitutional responsibility of impartial adjudication bestowed on it in section 6 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended. Hence, judgments or decisions of the Local Government Tribunals, when rendered or delivered, must inspire public confidence. Justice is rooted in confidence. In the case of GARBA v FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION & ANOR (1988) LPELR-1304(SC) (Pp. 28-29 paras. C), the Supreme Court per Eso JSC said among other things that “For the Judiciary, a powerful arm of government to operate under the rule of law, full confidence, and this must be unadulterated, must exist in that institution. It must indeed be demonstrably shown.” Enough said on the need for unadulterated public confidence on the judiciary.

Finally, on the duties and responsibilities of the 768 Local Government Areas created under section 3(6) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended, it is beyond argument that as a result of prolonged asphyxiation, usurpation and appropriation of its responsibilities by the States, over the years, many Nigerians have forgotten the functions of the Local Governments. Many others may not even know that the Local Government is saddled with clear-cut constitutional duties. Out of abundant caution, the functions of a Local Government Council as expressly stated in the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended are as follows:

1. The main functions of a local government council are as follows:
(a) the consideration and the making of Recommendations to a State commission on economic planning or any similar body on –
(i) the economic development of the State, particularly in so far as the areas of authority of the Council and of the State are affected, and
(ii) proposals made by the said Commission or body;
(b) collection of rates, radio and television licences;
(c) establishment and maintenance of cemeteries, burial grounds and homes for the destitute or infirm;
(d) Licensing of bicycles, trucks, (other than mechanically propelled trucks), canoes, wheel barrows and carts;
(e) establishment, maintenance and regulation of slaughter houses, slaughter slabs, markets, motor parks and public conveniences;
(f) construction and maintenance of roads, streets, street lightings, drains and other public highways, parks, gardens, open spaces, or such public facilities as may be prescribed from time to time by the House of Assembly of a State;
(g) naming of roads, and streets and numbering of house;
(h) provision and maintenance of public conveniences; sewage and refuse disposal;
(i) registration of all births, deaths and marriages;
(j) assessment of privately owned houses or tenements for the purpose of levying such rates as may be prescribed by the House of Assembly of a State; and
(k) control and regulation of –
(i) out-door advertising and hoarding’
(ii) movement and keeping of pets of all description
(iii) shops and kiosks’
(iv) restaurants, bakeries and other places for sale of food to the public,
(v) laundries, and
(vi) licensing, regulation and control of the sale of liquor.
A note of caution must be sounded that the Local Government is subordinated to the State Government just as the State is subordinated to the Federal Government. Although Local Government Councils enjoy autonomy, for sustainable and even development to take root in any given State, there must be intentional cooperation and synergy between the State and Local Government Councils. A fully functional Local Government system is an indispensable handmaid for good governance in any State. The Local Government Council is the grassroots government or government closest or nearest to the people. Hence, under section 2 of the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended, the functions of the Local Government Council shall also include participation of such Council in the Government of a State as respects the following matters-
(a) the provision and maintenance of primary, adult and vocational education;
(b) the development of agriculture and natural resources other than the exploitation of minerals;
(c) the provision and maintenance of health services; and
(d) such other functions as may be conferred on a Local Government Council by the House of Assembly of the State.

Conclusively, return of democratically elected Local Government Councils in Imo State will wake up all comatose, moribund By-laws or forgotten departments and organs in the Local Government Councils. Of a truth, a well-run Local Government system will reduce undue political and development pressure on the State Government as it will help foster grassroots politics, restore security and fastrack development in the rural areas. When elected and sworn into office, the Chairmen and Councilors should always remember that security and welfare of the people is the primary purpose of government. No excuses. Imo people are encouraged ahead of time to be prepared to hold them responsible and accountable. The days of diaspora governance in the Local Governments and reckless use of public resources should be over.
A new normal is possible!

Politics

Autonomy: FG, govs, LG chairs sign implementation agreement

Published

on

Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi
Spread the love

Autonomy: FG, govs, LG chairs sign implementation agreement

The Committee on Local Government Autonomy set up by the Federal Government has concluded its meetings and signed the technical document, which is expected to be transmitted to President Bola Tinubu soon.

The National President of the National Union of Local Government Employees, Hakeem Ambali, made this known in an interview with our correspondent on Tuesday.

In May, the Federal Government, represented by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, filed a lawsuit to challenge the governors’ authority to receive and withhold federal allocations meant for Local Government Areas.

The suit sought to prevent state governors from unilaterally dissolving democratically elected local government councils and establishing caretaker committees.

The AGF argued that the constitution mandated a democratically elected local government system and did not allow alternative governance structures.

On July 11, 2024, the Supreme Court gave a landmark judgment affirming the financial autonomy of the 774 LGs in the country, noting that governors could no longer control funds meant for the councils.

The seven-member Supreme Court panel, led by Justice Garba Lawal, ruled that it was illegal and unconstitutional for governors to manage and withhold LG funds.

The apex court also directed the Accountant-General of the Federation to pay LG allocations directly to their accounts, as it declared the non-remittance of funds by the 36 states unconstitutional.

Also, on August 20, the Federal Government instituted a 10-member inter-ministerial committee to implement the Supreme Court’s ruling on local government autonomy.

The committee members include the Minister of Finance & Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun; Attorney-General of the Federation & Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi SAN; Minister of Budget & Economic Planning, Abubakar Bagudu; Accountant-General of the Federation; Oluwatoyin Madein and the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Olayemi Cardoso.

Others are the Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Finance, Mrs Lydia Jafiya, the Chairman, Revenue Mobilisation Allocation & Fiscal Commission, Mohammed Shehu, and representatives of state governors and the local governments.

The committee’s primary goal is to ensure that local governments are granted full autonomy, allowing them to function effectively without interference from state governments.

Speaking to our correspondent on Tuesday, Ambali said, “The committee has held its final meeting and we have signed the technical document which will be transmitted to Mr President so by November end. It is expected that states will receive their allocations from FAAC. Also, I can tell you that the President is eager to receive that document. The committee worked within the time frame that was provided.”

Meanwhile, the National Union of Teachers has expressed fears about the capacity of LGs to pay the N70,000 new minimum wage to primary school teachers.

The NUT’s apprehension is hinged on the failure of the councils to implement the former N30,000 minimum wage.

Findings by our correspondent show that some LG workers in Nasarawa, Enugu, Zamfara, Borno, Yobe, and Kogi states, among others, have remained on the N18,000 minimum wage, which was approved in 2011.

However, the inability of the councils to implement the minimum wage has been blamed on the failure of the government to fully implement the LG autonomy.

Data obtained from the NUT revealed that teachers in LG primary schools were not paid the former minimum wage.

In Enugu State, for instance, LG workers were exempted from benefitting from the minimum wage though the state workers enjoyed the minimum wage salaries.

Also, Abia, Adamawa, Bauchi, Nasarawa, Kogi, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe, Zamfara, Imo and Gombe States did not implement the old minimum wage for teachers at both state and local levels.

Confirming this, the General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, Dr. Mike Ene said, “I can tell you that some states didn’t even implement the N18,000 minimum wage for teachers at the local level. Some governors refused to pay stating that the teachers are under the employment of the local governments.

“There should be no form of segregation when it comes to the implementation of the minimum wage. We all go to the same market. There is no specific market for local government workers. However, we commend all the governors who have come out to say that the minimum wage will be implemented across the board.

“Also, the NLC has vowed to shake the country by December should state governments fail to implement the minimum wage so I can tell you that the move by the NLC will force things into play.”

But NULGE president Ambali assured that the minimum wage would be implemented across the board when the LG autonomy commences.

“Over the years, governors have had one excuse and that is the fact that they always claimed that LGs are autonomous so they can’t negotiate minimum wage on behalf of LG workers. But the truth is that LGs were never autonomous during those periods.

“However, during the negotiation of the new minimum wage, the President brought in representatives of ALGON (Association of Local Government of Nigeria) to also negotiate and with the LG autonomy coming into play, that will be settled. The NLC has also given an ultimatum of December for all states as regards the payment of the minimum wage,” he added.

Continue Reading

Politics

North Korean defectors are already betraying Russia

Published

on

North Korean defectors are already betraying Russia © Unsplash
Spread the love

A group of North Korean defectors has provided Ukrainian authorities with leaflets urging Kim Jong Un’s troops to lay down their arms and return home.

The group delivered handwritten notes and audio messages to Kyiv, outlining instructions for surrender and directions on how to reach the South Korean embassy in the Ukrainian capital, according to South Korean news agency Yonhap.

The Asian media outlet reports that the Ukrainian military could prompt a large number of North Korean soldiers to surrender “if proactive psychological warfare is employed,” as stated by Jang Se-yul, the group’s leader.

Washington has confirmed that 10,000 North Korean soldiers have been deployed to Kursk to help recapture the region, which has been partially controlled by Ukrainian forces following a surprise offensive this summer.

Since the start of the war in Ukraine, relations between Russia and North Korea have strengthened significantly, with the two nations signing a mutual defense pact last summer.

In exchange for sending troops, Pyongyang expects technological support from Moscow to advance and accelerate its nuclear weapons program.

Continue Reading

Politics

Biden sending aid for Ukraine to keep fighting next year, Blinken says

Published

on

In this photo provided by the Ukrainian Emergency Service on Nov. 13, 2024, rescue workers extinguish a fire of a building destroyed by a Russian strike in Brovary, Kyiv. © AP Photo
Spread the love

US President Joe Biden will send “as much aid as possible” to Ukraine in its final few months in power, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Wednesday during a trip to Brussels.

“President Biden has committed to making sure that every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed out the door between now and 20 January,” when Donald Trump is due to be sworn in to power, Blinken said.

The US will “adapt and adjust” what latest equipment it is sending, without providing details on what military equipment the US plans to provide the country, which is nearing its third year of war against neighbouring Russia.

He added that NATO countries should focus their efforts on ensuring Ukraine “has the money, munitions and mobilised forces” to either fight effectively in 2025, or negotiate peace from a position of strength.

There is a shadow of political uncertainty surrounding how the US will approach its policy on the war following the inaugaration of Trump.

The US is currently the largest provider of military aid to Ukraine, upon which it is heavily reliant. Trump has not given concrete details on what his administrations approach to the war would be, but has said multiple times that he would consider halting funds to the war war-torn country.

The war in Ukraine has shown no signs of slowing down, with Russia launching a huge attack on the country’s capital, Kyiv, on Wednesday with a combination of missile and drones.

Eight regions across Ukraine were attacked in total on Wednesday, with Russia firing six ballistic and cruise missiles and 90 drones, according to the Ukrainian air force.

North Korean troops have also been confirmed to be present in the war, with the US State Department saying that most of them are fighting to drive Ukraine’s army off Russian soil in the Kursk region, where Ukraine launched a surprise incursion earlier this year.

Russia’s military has trained the North Korean soldiers in artillery, drone skills and basic infantry operations, including trench clearing, said State Department spokesman Vedant Patel on Tuesday.

Kyiv officials say that Russia has deployed around 50,000 troops in a bid to dislodge Ukrainian soldiers from the Kursk region.

Russia has in recent months been assembling forces for a counteroffensive in Kursk, according to the Institute for the Study of War think tank, though the timescale of the operation isn’t known.

Continue Reading

Trending