Connect with us

Politics

Anioma People are Of Igbo Descent and must be used to balance South East region- Ned Nwoko

Published

on

Spread the love

Anioma People are Of Igbo Descent and must be used to balance South East region- Ned Nwoko

Let AniomaState be written by Ned  Nwoko.
The recent revival of the demand for the creation of Anioma State,
essentially driven by Senator Ned Nwoko, is in keeping with the
aspiration of our people. The demand for the creation of Anioma state
has been long-standing and must rank as one of the oldest agitations
in the political history of Nigeria. Political detractors would want you to believe that Senator Nwoko’s interest in the Anioma State movement is just for his politics. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

The agitation has always been driven by the Anioma people who are of Igbo descent and reside in the northern part of Delta State. The
Anioma people, though located in Delta State, share a distinct Igbo
cultural identity that is remarkably different from the Urhobo and
Itsekiri ethnic groups in the state. This distinctive demand has
enjoyed the support of all well-meaning persons in that enclave. The very term, Anioma, coined by the illustrious Chief (Dr) Dennis
Osadebay as far back as 1951, has remained the unchanging acronym by
which this area has been identified.

So, the inspired poet and politician, the only Premier of the defunct
Mid-West Region, Dennis Osadebay, was the uncontestable founding
father of the Anioma state movement. Down the decades since then,
Anioma people have remained wedded to this ideal that has remained
Osadebay’s greatest bequest to his people as they struggle to find a befitting foothold in the Nigerian commonwealth as well as a plank on
which to build a fast and stable development that should show other
African peoples the way to follow.

Here, one remembers with nostalgia, the role played by proud Anioma
sons and daughters in the early 1980s. Of particular note was the late
Chief Sony Odogwu (Ide Ahaba) and Chief (Hon) Willy Ikolodo (Uwolo of
Ibusa) dual leadership of the Bendel East Cultural Association (BECA),
the activism of Dr. Amadi Emina, Sen. Nosike Ikpo, Ambassador Raph
Uwechue, Chief Andrew Monye, Mr. I. S. Moemeke, Chief Philip Asiodu, Professor B. I. C. Ijeoma, Ambassador Orewa and
Professor Onianwa, just to mention but a few. Creating Anioma State
would provide the Anioma people with a unique platform to preserve,
promote, and develop their cultural heritage. The recognition of
Anioma as a distinct political entity would fulfill their aspirations
for self-determination and ensure their traditions and values are
fully represented at a state level.

The case for creating Anioma State is grounded in several key
arguments, which include cultural identity, equitable representation,
administrative efficiency, and socio-economic development. There is a
historical argument that Anioma lands were arbitrarily merged with
non-Igbo regions during state creation exercises in Nigeria’s colonial
and post-colonial eras. This administrative decision ignored the
cultural and ethnic affinities of the Anioma people with the wider
Igbo community. Rectifying this historical oversight would not only
address a long-standing grievance but also reaffirm the Nigerian
government’s commitment to justice and fairness.

Yet, commentators, including self-styled Anioma experts often failed to mention the lost parts of Anioma, which the British
colonialists carved up and threw to different directions that should
be brought back to their Anioma family. So, Anioma state, when
created should unify the entire Anioma people who were so dastardly
punished by the British for the Ekumeku revolution that lasted all of 31 years—from 1883 to 1914.

By 1870, the crisis between Anioma and Britain had degenerated as the colonialists invaded Ndoni, an Anioma community now in Rivers state,
to gain control of their market. The Royal Niger Company invaded Atani
another Anioma community (now in Anambra state) in 1880; it was pure
genocide. On November 2, 1897, Onicha-Ado (Onitsha) an Anioma
community was bombarded. The following year, Ibusa felt the sting of
the British, in a surprise attack. The Ibusa forces retreated and the
British was still savouring an easy victory when Ibusa
counter-attacked in the first battle of the Ekumeku war. Writing in
1898, Father Zappa emphasized that rather than surrender, “the
Ekwumekwu soldiers continued to resist as the Ibusa forces
reinforced.” The British Commander, Major Festings, appealed for
reinforcement of troops from Lokoja to help subdue Ibusa.

On February 11, 1904, Owa (near Agbor), had to defend herself against
the British. W. E. B. Crawford Coupland, the Divisional Commissioner
ordered for 4 Connaught Rangers, 2.95 artillery and other weapons. Ekute provided military support to the Ekumeku soldiers. The
Commander, Lt H. C. Moorhouse would later defend himself on why he sustained casualties; he said Owa had well-trained soldiers and their
geographical knowledge was an advantage. Mr. S. O. Crewe lost his life
in the battle. This has been rated as one of the fiercest resistances
the Ekumeku warriors put up as the fight raged for weeks.

The battle of Ogwashi-Uku began on November 2, 1909 with a mandate to
the British Forces to kill everybody on their way. Yet, the British
invaders sustained 34 casualties, most notably Captain H. C. Chapman.
In 1910, the British made Ogwashi the Asaba Division Headquarters
(Nigeria’s first LGA Headquarters) and built a prison there to contain the Ekumeku insurgency. Ekumeku fighters rallied from Onicha-Ugbo,
Onicha-Olona, Ubulu-Uku, Obomkpa, Idumuje and other towns to help
Ogwashi in that battle. So the British deliberately balkanized Anioma;
and Anioma territories such as Onicha-Ado and Oguta were permanently
lost to the Easterners. Onitsha’s changed spelling disassociated it
from their Onicha-Olona, Onicha-Ukwu, Onicha-Uku or Onicha-Ugbo kins
in Anioma. Anioma was divided into four and thrown to other groups
who would lord it over them. Asaba Division was joined to the Benin
Province and Aboh Division were joined with Urhobo, Ijaws and
Itsekiris to make up the Delta Province. Onitsha, Oguta and environs
were joined to the Eastern provinces.

This made political unity nearly impossible. This disunity continues
to this day. All that is needed to connect Aboh and or Isiagwu with Oguta is just a bridge; during the Nigerian Civil war, the “Afia Attack”, (War market) was conducted along that axis as inspired
individuals traded with both the Nigerians and Biafrans on both sides of the River Niger leading the Nigerian troops to massacre 400 Ishiagwu people in one night. Boundary adjustment will bring Igbanke,
Ute-Oheze, Iru, Owariozor, Obagie N’Oheze, Ekpon, Owanikeke, Iyenle
people of Edo State, Abuetor and Osekwenike of Bayelsa home, Ndoni of
Rivers, Anambra’s Onitsha, Ozobulu, Obosi, Oraifite and Imo state’s
Oguta to Anioma.

State creation has historically been a tool for promoting unity,
addressing ethnic grievances, and fostering development. Examples
include the creation of Ebonyi State from parts of Abia and Enugu
States, which addressed similar demands for political inclusion and
economic development. The success of these past state creation
exercises provides a valid precedent for the creation of Anioma State,
showing that new states can lead to greater peace, equity, and
prosperity. The push for Anioma State has garnered significant support
from various quarters, including local leaders, cultural groups, and
political representatives. There is a strong consensus within the
Anioma community and a commitment to peaceful advocacy for their
cause. Nationally, the creation of Anioma State would reflect
Nigeria’s commitment to listening to the demands of its diverse
population, ensuring that marginalized groups are given a platform for
development.

By addressing historical grievances and creating a more efficient
administrative unit, Anioma State could serve as a model for future
governance in Nigeria, after all, through the Ekumekwu war, the first
open rebellion against white colonialists in Africa, Anioma taught the entire Africa to fight for political freedom. Anioma state should teach Nigerian states economic viability lessons.

*Prof Sylvester Monye MFR, a proud son of Anioma, was Executive Secretary of the National Planning Commission and Policy Adviser to former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCON, GCFR.

Politics

Sheikh Hasina’s extradition discussed during PM Modi, Muhammad Yunus’s meeting: Foreign secy Vikram Misri

Published

on

Spread the love

Bangkok [Thailand], April 4 (ANI): Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday met with Bangladesh’s chief advisor Muhammad Yunus for the first time since Sheikh Hasina’s ouster. in their meeting that was held on the sidelines of the BIMSTEC Summit in Bangkok, the two leaders discussed Sheikh Hasina’s extradition, the Foreign Secretary of India, Vikram Misri said.

 

Addressing a special briefing on PM Modi’s visit to Thailand, Misri stated “There were talks on Sheikh Hasina’s extradition. Can’t say more on that.”

Further, Misri said that PM Modi has expressed India’s concerns over the safety and security of minorities, including Hindus in Bangladesh during his meeting.

“PM Modi reiterated India’s support for democratic, stable, peaceful, progressive and inclusive Bangladesh. He underlined India’s desire to forge a positive and constructive relationship with Bangladesh. The PM also urged that any rhetoric that vitiates the environment is best avoided,” foreign secretary Vikram Misri said.

Misri further said that the situation of minorities, including that of Hindu minorities were raised by India.

“The PM also urged that any rhetoric that vitiates the environment is best avoided. On the border, strict enforcement of the law and prevention of illegal border crossing are necessary to maintain border security and security. The PM also underlines India’s concerns over the safety and security of minorities, including Hindus in Bangladesh,” he added.

PM Modi is in Bangkok for the 6th BIMSTEC Summit.

In a post on X, he said, “With fellow BIMSTEC leaders at the Summit being held in Bangkok, Thailand. We reaffirm our commitment to boosting cooperation across diverse sectors. May our efforts bring a positive difference in people’s lives.”

The 6th BIMSTEC Summit marks a significant regional engagement between India and its neighbouring countries in the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) group.

Continue Reading

Politics

Court stops pro-Wike rally in Bayelsa

Published

on

Spread the love

The Bayelsa State High Court, sitting in Yenagoa, has issued an order restraining associates of Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), from holding a planned mega rally in the state.

Ekwutosblog reports that the proposed rally was scheduled for April 12, 2025, in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital.

Hon. Justice I.A. Uzakah, on Thursday, granted the Motion Ex-Parte in Suit No. BYHC/YHC/CV/133/2025, filed by the State’s Attorney General, Biriyai Dambo, SAN.

Lead convener of the NEW Associates, organizers of the rally, Mr. George Turnah, and the FCT Minister, Wike, were listed as the first and second defendants/respondents in the suit.

The other defendants were the Nigeria Police Force, the Inspector-General of Police, and the Commissioner of Police, Bayelsa State Police Command.

The matter was, thereafter, adjourned to April 11, 2025, for hearing.

Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court voids verdict recognising Abure as LP’s National Chairman

Published

on

Abure
Spread the love

By Ikechukwu Nnochiri

ABUJA– The Supreme Court, on Friday, nullified the judgement that recognised Mr. Julius Abure as the National Chairman of the Labour Party, LP.

In a unanimous decision, a five-man panel of the apex court vacated the January 17 judgement of Court of Appeal in Abuja, which validated Abure’s continued stay in office as National Chairman of the party.

According to the Supreme Court, the appellate court lacked the jurisdiction to enter any pronouncement in favour of Abure since it had earlier found that the subject matter of the dispute bordered on the leadership of a political party.

It held that the substance of the case centered on the domestic affair of a political party which no court has the powers to meddle into.

Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal that was filed by a former Minister of Finance, Senator Esther Nenadi Usman and Hon. Darlington Nwokocha, who are the Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of a Caretaker Committee that was earlier appointed to pilot the affairs of the party.

It will be recalled that following a leadership crisis that rocked the LP, the National Executive Committee, NEC, of the party resolved to remove Abure as the National Chairman.

To fill the leadership vacuum, the party constituted a 29-member caretaker committee, with the former Finance Minister, Senator Usman as Chairman and Hon. Nwokocha as Secretary.

The decision was the outcome of an expanded stakeholders’ meeting of the party that was hosted in Umuahia by governor Alex Otti of Abia State.

The meeting where Abure was sacked from office was chaired by his former ally and candidate of the party in the 2023 presidential election, Mr. Peter Obi.

Dissatisfied with the decision, Abure approached the Federal High Court in Abuja to validate his position as the National Chairman of the party.

In an affidavit he personally deposed to in support of the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1271/2024, Abure told the court that following the death of the National Chairman of the LP, he was lawfully elected as the Acting National Chairman of the party at a National Executive Council, NEC, meeting of the party that held in Benin City, Edo State, on March 29, 2021.

He told the court that on April 18, 2023, at the NEC meeting of the party held in Asaba, Delta State and duly monitored by INEC, it was resolved that tenures of State Chairmen whose tenures had expired, be renewed.

He said it was at the same meeting that some members that were engaged in anti-party activities were expelled and replacements for vacant positions created as a result of the expulsion, done.

Abure averred that in line with a consensus that was reached at the meeting, the party subsequently held its National Convention on March 27, 2024, at Nnewi, Anambra State, where we was lawfully elected to the office of National Chairman of the LP.

He said the party under his leadership produced candidates for governorship elections in both Edo and Ondo states.

According to the plaintiff, on June 28, 2024, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, issued to him and 18 other National Chairmen of political parties, a Notice for Inspection of Sensitive Election Materials for the Ondo and Edo state governorship polls.

However, he decried that a later notice that INEC gave for political parties to nominate two persons from their IT Unit to undertake a training on how to upload data unto INEC’s portal for the purpose of the impending  Ondo state gubernatorial election, was not served on him.

Abure told the court that he became aware of the existence of the said notice of the training by INEC, on August 21, 2024, due to the fact that he is a member of the Inter-Party Advisory Committee, IPAC.

Therefore, he prayed the court to intervene by compelling INEC to acord him recognition as the National Chairman of the LP.

Delivering judgement in the matter on October 8, 2024, trial Justice Emeka Nwite held that he found merit in the case of the plaintiff.

He ordered INEC grant the LP under Abure’s leadership, all the rights and privileges accorded a political party duly registered in the country.

The court further directed INEC to perform its lawful duty by conducting a refresher training for the upload of LP’s agents into the INEC portal and to issue the plaintiff (Abure) the Access Code required to access INEC’s portal for the Ondo Governorship Election that held on November 16, 2024.

“I am of the view that and so hold that on the basis of these cogent verifiable documents, the defendants attempt to impeach the validity of the leadership of the plaintiff fails.

“The plaintiff has proved his case.

“I hereby make an order compelling the defendant to accord the plaintiff’s political party under the leadership of Barrister Julius Abure all the rights and privileges accorded a political party duly registered in Nigeria,” Justice Nwite held.

Though the high court’s judgement was affirmed by the appellate court, it was however set-aside by the Supreme Court on Friday.

Continue Reading

Trending