Connect with us

Politics

Singapore seeks to navigate US-China rivalry regardless of presidential election outcome

Published

on

Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong shakes hands with Senior Minister and ex-PM Lee Hsien Loong at the Istana in Singapore on May 15. Photo: EPA-EFE
Spread the love

The city state has adapted well to the rivalry and is unlikely to shift from its hedging policy between Washington and Beijing, analysts say

As the United States presidential election draws closer, Singapore is keeping a close eye on how the outcome could affect its careful tightrope walk between the world’s largest economy and China amid their ongoing geopolitical rivalry and trade war.

The city state has been adapting well to the evolving realities arising from the fallout of the US-China rivalry, analysts say.

Regardless of who becomes the next US leader following the November 5 election – Vice-President Kamala Harris or ex-president Donald Trump – the fundamentals of America’s foreign policies towards China and Asia are unlikely to change drastically as much of the uncertainty has been factored in, according to analysts.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

“While Trump may inject greater uncertainty and unpredictability, a Harris presidency will not and cannot suddenly engender stability, peace and predictability,” said Dylan Loh, an assistant professor at Nanyang Technological University’s Public Policy and Global Affairs division.

Last week, Singapore’s Senior Minister and former prime minister Lee Hsien Loong warned that if Trump were to slap tariffs of 60 per cent or higher on Chinese goods in his second term as promised, it would put Singapore in “uncharted territory”.

“On the American side, there are not many issues where the Democrats and the Republicans agree on, but this is one [US policy towards China]. And that is a very serious matter. So whether it is Harris or whether it is Trump, that is not going to be changing,” Lee said at a business event last week.

A second Trump term would likely spell more disruptions for American allies and other countries, he said. “In particular, I think, what you can anticipate is that his attitude towards allies, towards America’s friends, will be different from what the Democrat administration has done in these last four years,” Lee added.

In an interview with The Economist in May, days before he became Singapore’s prime minister, Lawrence Wong described the city state as being neither pro-China nor pro-US but “pro-Singapore”. He stressed that Singapore must brace itself for the possibility of a decade or more of unpredictability as the US and China sought a new equilibrium in their relationship.

Last year, Singapore and China upgraded their free trade agreement, which would give businesses from the city state more access to Chinese markets. China has been Singapore’s biggest trading partner since 2013, with two-way trade totalling US$108.39 billion last year, according to data from both countries.

Singapore also has a free-trade agreement with the US since 2004, Washington’s first with an Asian country.

Meanwhile, regional countries such as Singapore and Malaysia have been closely monitoring the impact of the US-China tech war as global businesses seek a haven from the fallout.

Singapore has become one of the top destinations for global tech firms looking to expand their operations into the region, and is home to 80 of the world’s top 100 technology companies, according to a 2023 article published by the Economic Development Board.

Singapore’s Pulau Brani port terminal. The country’s two biggest trading partners are China and the US. Photo: AFP

 

Hedging policy

Harris and Trump have so far been vague about their plans for Southeast Asia, according to analysts who spoke to The Post previously

Ongoing wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have diverted Washington’s attention from Southeast Asia, which could limit its ability to engage effectively with the region and Singapore, the analysts said.

While Trump was expected to be “more transactional” in dealing with Washington’s regional allies, Harris would likely adopt a “more personal approach” in dealing with the region, they added.

Singapore is expected to be agnostic about the next US president and is unlikely to depart from its hedging policy between Washington and Beijing, according to one analyst.

In an Asia New Zealand Foundation commentary published earlier this week, NTU’s Loh wrote that across the Trump and Joe Biden administrations in the US, ties between Washington and Singapore had not shifted drastically “from its historically strong and progressive character”.

He pointed out that there were important progress made in areas such as critical technologies, clean energy, and financial technologies throughout the two administrations.

Then US President Donald Trump talks with then Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in the city state in 2018. Photo: AP

 

Relations between the US and Singapore were based on common interests and pragmatism, said Bilahari Kausikan, a former permanent secretary of Singapore’s foreign ministry.

“There is only one America which plays a vital role in maintaining balance in Asia – a role that is now acknowledged by traditionally non-aligned countries like India and Indonesia and even old enemies like Vietnam – so we will find a way of working with whoever occupies the White House,” he wrote in a Facebook post earlier this week.

If Trump were to carry out his promise to levy tariffs on all imports to promote American manufacturing, it would slow the world economy, Kausikan said.

He was referring to the Republican presidential candidate’s proposal to impose a 20 per cent tariff on goods from all US trading partners and at least 60 per cent on Chinese imports.

Kausikan said Trump could also adopt a tougher stance on Chinese goods using Southeast Asia as a “back door into the US”. While Harris would likely not ignore these issues, she might not “pursue them with the same sharpness” as Trump, Kausikan added.

“We have to understand that the US attitude towards trade has fundamentally changed and adapt ourselves to the new reality,” he said.

US Vice President Kamala Harris attends a news conference in Singapore in 2021. Photo: AP

 

Tan See Seng, research adviser at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), said any move to impose higher tariffs on US trading partners could prove “challenging” for Singapore, given the city state’s heavy reliance on global trade.

“If Trump wins, he is likely to reconvene another trade war with China. If that leads to China doubling down on its ongoing effort to ‘decouple’ its economy from the US, Singapore’s economy will be affected but it’s unclear at this point exactly how so,” he added.

On the other hand, Harris would likely take on a more “nuanced strategy” if she were to become president, Tan said. Regardless of the next occupant of the White House, Singapore would have to find a “sweet spot” to manage its ties with China and the US, he added.

The dynamics within the Democratic and Republican parties would also influence the approach of the US towards China, said Chong Ja Ian, a political scientist from the National University of Singapore.

Some Republicans have been calling for a tougher approach towards Beijing while others from the same party preferred for Washington to maintain the status quo, he said.

“We’re not sure, even after the presidential election, which of these voices will win out within the different parties. If Trump wins, he cycles through these people quickly so there could be a lot of vacillation among these different kinds of voices,” he said.

In comparison, Washington’s China policy could be more “gradual” under a Harris administration, he added.

Singapore and other Southeast Asian countries have learnt to navigate through the US presidential cycles every four years, including their impact on Washington’s relationship with China, analysts said.

Tan from RSIS said: “China may respond a little differently to the US depending on who is leading America and Singapore will need to adroitly go with the flow.”

More Articles from SCMP

Art Basel Paris boosts city’s Art Week, full of art fairs, exhibitions and Hollywood stars

Wet markets at some public housing estates in Hong Kong no bargain for residents, poll finds

Teaching Hong Kong’s rule of law and fostering patriotism are ‘inseparable’: justice minister

Hong Kong can fulfil its hydrogen ambitions via Foshan, suggests start-up

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (www.scmp.com), the leading news media reporting on China and Asia.

Copyright (c) 2024. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

Politics

Nigerian Government lists Simon Ekpa, 15 others as terrorism financiers

Published

on

Spread the love

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has approved the designation of Finland-based Biafra nation agitator, Simon Ekpa Njoku, and 15 others as terrorism financiers.

Consequently, the Attorney General of the Federation, AGF, and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, has listed the indicted Nigerians and certain entities on the Nigeria Sanctions List.

At the Nigeria Sanctions Committee meeting on 6th March 2025, the Nigerian government invoked Section 54 of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, to take action against those indicted for alleged acts of terrorism against the country.

By invoking the Act, the Nigeria Sanctions Committee has been mandated to immediately identify and freeze, without prior notice, all funds, assets, and any other economic resources belonging to the designated individuals, in possession of banks, and report the same to the Sanctions Committee.

Banks and other financial institutions are required to report to the Sanctions Committee any assets frozen or actions taken in compliance with the prohibition requirements and to immediately file a Suspicious Transactions Report to the NFIU for further analysis of the financial activities of such individuals or entities.

Among those designated as terrorism financiers are Godstime Promise Iyare, Francis Chukwuedo, John Anayo Onwumere, Chikwuka Godwin Eze, Edwin Augustine Chukwuedo, and Chinwendu Joy Owoh.

Others include Ginika Jane Orji, Awo Uchechukwu, Mercy Ebere Ifeoma Ali, Ohagwu Nneka Juliana, Eze Chibuike Okpoto, Nwaobi Henry Chimezie, Ogomu Peace Kewe, Igwe Ka Ala, Seficuvi Global Company, and Lakurawa Group.

A statement from the AGF on Wednesday directed that freezing measures should be extended to all accounts associated with the designated individuals and entities.

For designated entities, the statement specified that the freezing should include accounts linked to their signatories and directors to ensure comprehensive enforcement of the sanctions regime.

Continue Reading

Politics

Alleged fraud: EFCC grills former minister Kennedy-Ohanenye

Published

on

Spread the love

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday interrogated the immediate past Minister for Women Affairs, Uju Kennedy Ohanenye, over her alleged involvement in the misappropriation, violation of procurement processes, and diversion of public funds amounting to N138.4 million during the disbursement of the ministry’s 2023 budgeted funds.

The former minister reportedly arrived at the EFCC headquarters around 11 am on Thursday, where she was questioned regarding her alleged role in the fraud.

Investigations by EFCC revealed that funds donated for the P-Bat Cares for Women Initiative were allegedly diverted for her personal enrichment.

It will be recalled that she was among the ministers President Bola Tinubu relieved of their duties in October 2024.

Uju Kennedy Ohanenye was appointed Minister of Women Affairs by Tinubu on 21 August 2023.

Continue Reading

Politics

APC chieftain, Shinkafi criticizes Tinubu’s appointments, warns of 2027 repercussions

Published

on

Spread the love

A prominent chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Sani Abdullahi Shinkafi, has described President Bola Tinubu’s appointments as lopsided, particularly in the Northwest, where Zamfara State—one of the key states that secured his victory in the 2023 presidential election—has been largely sidelined.

Speaking to journalists in Gusau, the Zamfara State capital, during the inauguration of his political movement, the Wamban Shinkafi Democratic Front (WSDF), Shinkafi urged President Tinubu to address the imbalance in federal appointments and intensify efforts to resolve the persistent security crisis affecting Zamfara residents.

Shinkafi, who resigned as the National Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to join the APC alongside former Zamfara State Governor Bello Mohammed, expressed disappointment that despite Zamfara being one of only two Northwestern states—alongside Jigawa—that voted for Tinubu in the last election, it has not been adequately rewarded.

He labeled the distribution of appointments under Tinubu’s administration as a betrayal of the people of Zamfara and warned that if the situation is not corrected, it could undermine the president’s chances in the 2027 election, as the Northwest may withhold the overwhelming support it previously gave him.

Shinkafi also called on Tinubu to intensify efforts to combat insecurity across Nigeria, with a special focus on Zamfara, where armed groups continue to kill, maim, and abduct innocent civilians while displacing entire communities.

Shinkafi further claimed that APC in Zamfara is deeply divided, with party members losing trust and confidence in its leadership.

He vowed to resist any attempts to impose candidates in the 2027 elections and called for strict adherence to internal party democracy to restore fairness and unity within the party.

Continue Reading

Trending