Connect with us

Politics

The Labour Party candidate for the Edo State governorship elections, Olumide Akpata, has condemned the decision of Governor Godwin Obaseki to swear in only five out of the eight new judges recommended for the Edo State High Court by the National Judicial Council (NJC).

Published

on

Spread the love

 

In a statement he personally signed, Akpata said it is regrettable that the achievements of the judges is being tarnished by the grave injustice they have endured at the hands of the Governor.

The former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), recalled that for nearly a year, the 8 legal professionals languished in an unconscionable career limbo, suffering immense financial hardship through loss of earnings owing to the refusal of the Governor to perform his constitutional duty to swear in all eight recommended Judges without any plausible justification.

According to Akpata, the fact that Obaseki has now proceeded to unilaterally select and swear in five out of the recommended eight judges is simply a tragedy and a travesty which has further rubbed salt on the injury, riding roughshod over another arm of government in clear violation of the principles of separation of powers and in the process, leaving the other three Judges and their families in a precarious dilemma.

The former NBA President, therefore, called on the National Assembly and the newly constituted Constitution Review Committees of both chambers of the Assembly to immediately initiate constitutional amendments that will permanently insulate the judicial appointment process from such reckless political interference.

Concrete safeguards, he said must also be established to forestall any recurrence of this invidious travesty, not just in Edo State but across the entire Federal Republic of Nigeria.

He also called on the citizens of Edo State to demand accountability, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to upholding the sanctity of the institutions from those who would presume to lead the state ahead of the 2024 governorship elections.

See the full statement below:

STATEMENT ON GOVERNOR GODWIN OBASEKI’S SWEARING-IN OF FIVE OUT OF EIGHT NEW JUDGES OF THE EDO STATE HIGH COURT

Around noon today, Friday, May 3rd, 2024, His Excellency, Governor Godwin Obaseki, the Executive Governor of Edo State, swore in five out of the eight new Judges recommended for the Edo State High Court by the National Judicial Council (NJC) at its 102nd meeting held on June 14th and 15th, 2023.

While one must congratulate the five newly sworn-in Judges on their well-deserved appointments, it is a matter of profound regret that their achievements, and those of the three Judges, who are yet to be sworn in, have been tarnished by the grave injustice they have endured at the hands of Governor Godwin Obaseki.

For nearly a year, these eight legal professionals languished in an unconscionable career limbo, with those previously in private practice suffering immense financial hardship through loss of earnings as they could not practice law as private practitioners having been recommended for appointment to the Bench.

To subject any human being or public servant, let alone prospective guardians of justice, to such indignities is totally unacceptable. And now, by swearing in only five out of the eight recommended Judges without any reason or explanation, Governor Obaseki has further rubbed salt on the injury, riding roughshod over another arm of government in clear violation of the principles of
separation of powers and in the process, leaving the other three Judges and their families in a precarious dilemma.

As a senior member of the Bar and a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), I condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the reprehensible conduct of His Excellency, Governor Godwin Obaseki, who willfully failed and refused to perform his constitutional duty to swear in all eight recommended Judges for nearly a year without any plausible justification.The fact that he has now proceeded to unilaterally select and swear in five out of the recommended eight Judges is simply a tragedy and a travesty.

The laughable defence proffered by the Edo State Commissioner of Information and Strategy that petitions existed against the recommended Judges is an outright falsehood that defies credulity.

As a member, at the time, of the very NJC that recommended these eight appointments, I can state categorically that all petitions were treated before the candidates were screened, and the successful candidates were the ones who were recommended for appointment to the Bench.

It is a despicable act of calumny to besmirch the reputations of these innocent professionals merely to provide cover for the Governor’s dereliction of duty. The unvarnished truth is that Governor Obaseki’s refusal to swear in the eight recommended Judges for eleven months and his decision now, to swear in only five of the eight Judges, stem from his displeasure at the fact that the list did not include his preferred candidates.

Rather than respecting the NJC’s recommendation, he chose to grind the appointment process to a complete halt through sheer obstructionism.
Sadly, this is not an isolated incident but part of a disturbing pattern of Governor Obaseki’s flagrant disregard for due process and the separation of powers.

In 2019, he similarly obstructed attempts to swear in fourteen duly elected members of the Edo State House of Assembly, displaying the same contempt for democratic tenets and institutions. For one who claims to be a democrat, such autocratic conduct is utterly reprehensible, and quite unfortunately, these ignoble actions will stand out as his enduring legacy, which no amount of spinning or propaganda can alter.

It definitely is no coincidence that this sudden decision by the Governor to swear in only five out of the eight recommended Judges, is coming five months before the Edo State gubernatorial elections. It is simply emblematic of the deceitful, self-serving politics that have become a hallmark of Governor Obaseki’s PDP government, putting partisan interests above the rule of law and the interests of the people.

Such conduct strikes at the very heart of our democracy and the principle of separation of powers. It represents a contemptuous attempt to subjugate the judiciary to the whims of the executive, stripping it of its independence and reducing it to a mere appendage of the governing party’s agenda. This is prrecisely why I have been at the vanguard of the struggle for comprehensive judicial reforms to emancipate our judiciary from the suffocating grip of executive overreach at all levels of government.

I hereby call upon the National Assembly (NASS) and the newly constituted Constitution Review Committees of both chambers of the NASS to immediately initiate constitutional amendments that will permanently insulate the judicial appointment process from such reckless political interference. Concrete safeguards must be established to forestall any recurrence of this invidious travesty, not just in Edo State but across the entire Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Failing to do so risks inflicting irreparable damage to our democratic institutions and the fundamental rights of our citizens.

To the five newly sworn-in Judges, I reiterate my congratulations and urge M’Lords to embrace their new roles as beacons of justice, equality, and the rule of law.

Their integrity, impartiality, and commitment to upholding the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria will be the ultimate bulwark against the erosion of our cherished democratic principles and values.

The people of Edo State have endured enough. They deserve far better than the contemptuous disregard for due process that Governor Obaseki has displayed by first delaying for no reason the swearing-in of the eight recommended Judges and now swearing in only five out of the eight recommended Judges. As we approach the pivotal 2024 gubernatorial elections, we must demand accountability, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to upholding the sanctity of our institutions from those who would presume to lead us.

OLUMIDE OSAIGBOVO AKPATA
Past President of the Nigerian Bar Association
Candidate of the Labour Party, Edo 2024 Election

 

Politics

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato, Boris Johnson urges

Published

on

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato 'now', Boris Johnson (left) has urged. Mr Johnson is pictured shaking hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (right) in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Friday, September 13, 2024
Spread the love

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato ‘now’, Boris Johnson has urged.

The former prime minister has said the move would be the ‘single biggest step’ the West could take to end Russia‘s war.

He admitted the United States and its allies would be alarmed about Ukraine joining the military alliance while fighting was ongoing.

It would mean all 32 Nato member states would have to commit to Ukraine’s defence.

But writing in today’s ­Spectator, he argues: ‘The risk is that we continue with the ambiguity and indecision over the future of Ukraine that has led to the worst war in Europe in my lifetime.

Ukraine should be allowed to join Nato ‘now’, Boris Johnson (left) has urged. Mr Johnson is pictured shaking hands with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (right) in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Friday, September 13, 2024

 

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (right) said after a summit in Washington in July that Nato had ‘confirmed Ukraine’s irreversible path to full membership’. Yet earlier this year, US President Joe Biden (left) said he was ‘not prepared to support the Nato-isation of Ukraine’. Sir Keir and President Biden are pictured together at the summit in DC on July 10, 2024

 

‘If we want peace, then we must put the Ukrainians in the strongest possible position, and this is how to do it.’

Ukraine has long sought membership of Nato and gained ‘aspiring member’ ­status in 2018, four years after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, but not all western leaders have been enthusiastic.

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky stepped up the demand in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s invasion in early 2022. However, at a summit last year Nato leaders said Ukraine could join only once it had completed ‘democratic and security sector reforms‘.

At the time, Mr Johnson said there should have been a timetable for membership ‘as soon as victory is won’. Now the former foreign secretary goes further, arguing: ‘We could invite Ukraine to join before the war is even over.’

‘We need to get Ukraine into Nato now, and I mean now,’ he writes. He suggests the critical Article 5 security guarantee – which means an attack on one Nato member is seen as an attack on all – could be extended to cover territory currently controlled by Kyiv, while allies should also reaffirm the country’s right to its borders.

‘We could protect most of Ukraine, while simultaneously supporting the Ukrainian right to recapture the rest,’ Mr Johnson writes, adding: ‘This is the single biggest step we can take to bring this hideous war to an end.

‘We would send the crucial message to the Kremlin, the one Russians really need to hear. The message is: that’s it. It’s over. You don’t have an empire any more.’

A Ukrainian tank of the 110th brigade moves through a field as it returns from a position at the frontline on Pokrovsk direction, Donetsk region, Ukraine on Wednesday, September 18, 2024

 

A heavily damaged and partially destroyed house following a Russian attack on the village of Komyshuvakha in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya region on September 17, 2024

 

He admits the decision depends above all on the US. Sir Keir Starmer said after a summit in Washington in July that Nato had ‘confirmed Ukraine’s irreversible path to full membership’.

Yet earlier this year, US President Joe Biden said he was ‘not prepared to support the Nato-isation of Ukraine’.

Mr Johnson adds: ‘We would all have to commit to the defence of that Ukrainian territory. And of course that will mean anxiety and resistance.’

He also renewed his call for Mr Biden and the Prime Minister to allow Ukraine to fire western Storm Shadow missiles into Russian territory, after talks last week between the pair failed to lead to a breakthrough.

Read more

Continue Reading

Politics

Russia’s ambassador hauled into the Foreign Office

Published

on

Andrey Kelin, Russia's ambassador to the UK, was hauled into the Foreign Office today over 'malicious and completely baseless' claims against British diplomats in Moscow
Spread the love

Russia’s ambassador to the UK was hauled into the Foreign Office today over ‘malicious and completely baseless’ claims against British diplomats in Moscow.

The Kremlin last week announced the expulsion of six Foreign Office staff from Russia and claimed to have evidence they were engaged in spying and sabotage.

The move ratcheted up tensions between Londonand Moscow as Sir Keir Starmer prepared to meet Joe Biden in Washington DC.

The PM and US President held talks on giving the go-ahead for Ukraine to use long-range missiles, including Britain’s Storm Shadow weapons, against targets in Russia.

The Foreign Office immediately rejected the claims by Russia’s FSB security agency against its staff in Moscow and today announced the summoning of Russian ambassador Andrey Kelin.

It said the action was taken in response to Moscow’s ‘malicious and deliberate public campaign of aggression against the UK’.

Andrey Kelin, Russia’s ambassador to the UK, was hauled into the Foreign Office today over ‘malicious and completely baseless’ claims against British diplomats in Moscow

 

The Foreign Office said the action was taken in response to Moscow’s ‘malicious and deliberate public campaign of aggression against the UK’

 

A Foreign Office spokesperson said: ‘The UK condemns in the strongest terms Russia’s unprecedented and unfounded public campaign of aggression against the UK, including the malicious and completely baseless accusations made against Foreign Office staff last week.

‘This behaviour is in direct contravention to Russia’s obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

‘This pattern of behaviour is completely unacceptable, deeply unprofessional, and beneath the standards of conduct between states.

‘This is the latest development in a deliberate campaign by Russia to undermine and threaten UK security and democracy and deter our support for Ukraine, through disinformation, acts of sabotage in Europe and direct harassment and restrictions against our diplomatic missions in Russia.

‘This campaign will not succeed. Russia must stop this activity immediately.’

The expulsion of six UK diplomats from Moscow is the latest in a series of diplomatic rows between Britain and Russia over the past year.

In May, the UK expelled Russia’s defence attache in London, Colonel Maxim Elovik, claiming he was an ‘undeclared military intelligence officer’, removed diplomatic status from several Russian-owned premises, and placed restrictions on Russian diplomatic visas.

In response, Russia expelled Britain’s defence attache in Moscow, Captain Adrian Coghill.

Despite Sir Keir and Mr Biden’s talks last week, no decision has yet been reached on giving Ukraine permission to use long-range missiles to target Russian airfields and military bases.

Read more

Continue Reading

Politics

Imo LG polls : Concerns as election allegedly postponed.

Published

on

Spread the love

According to recent news reports, the Imo State Local Government Election, initially scheduled for September 21, 2024, has been postponed.

The Imo State Independent Electoral Commission (ISIEC) announced the postponement due to concerns raised by political parties, including IPAC, regarding electoral irregularities and non-compliance with guidelines.

New election dates have not been officially announced.

Continue Reading

Trending