Connect with us

Columns

Tinubu’s Effort To Shift Blame For Bad Governance To Governors, Deceitful

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The 1st to 10th August 2024 End Bad Governance Nation – wide protest put tremendous pressure on President Tinubu, and exposed the failures of his administration.

The protesters demanded that the President must tell the nation how he intended to improve the deplorable state of the economy, and the ever-growing insecurity to life and property. They insisted that the President must change his extravagant lifestyle, reduce the size of his cabinet, and cut back on the cost of government. Unable to address these concerns, the President became unduly defensive and belligerent. He began to blame others for his own failures. The state governors were his favorite scapegoats.

In order to cement his accusations against the governors, Tinubu posited that they have all the money they need to develop their states if they wanted to.

According to the President, the N2.4 trillion Federal Government allocation which he approved for state governors between January and June 2024 was the largest ever in history. In addition to this allocation which translates to N431 billion monthly per state, the President announced that he gave each state an additional N570 billion.

Unfortunately, both of the generous funds which Tinubu claimed he has made available to the governors are fallacious misrepresentations.

Consider the facts: Given Nigeria’s 35% rate of inflation and the value of the naira which has depreciated by over 300% (450 to 1 dollar in 2022, and 1,500 to 1 dollar in 2024), the N2.4 trillion allocated to states from January to June 2024 is in reality less valuable than the N1.788 trillion six months Federal Government allocation to states by President Buhari in 2022.

In order for governors as alleged by Tinubu to be able to achieve similar developmental goals they achieved with N1.788 trillion (for six months, and N298 billion per month) in 2022, they would require N8.4 trillion, (six months), not N2.4 trillion. And for their monthly allocation they would require N1.508 trillion monthly, not N431 billion. Clearly the governors have less revenue to work with today, not more as alleged by Tinubu.

Disingenuous as the N2.4 trillion allocation issue is, the President’s other claim of providing an additional N570 billion to each state is even more egregious. Simply put, on the matter of the N570 billion additional funds, the president lied to the nation. As Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde and other governors have explained and as the World Health Organization (WHO) records show, the said N570 billion was a World Bank Intervention Fund for COVID Recovery. The States have already spent their own money for the purpose of fighting the impact of the COVID pandemic on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO), and were merely refunded through their Federal Government. This was how WHO refunded states all over the world.

President Tinubu mustaccept the responsibility for the myriads of problems which his policies and actions have brought upon Nigeria instead of blaming state governors. After all he has said that the buck stops with him as President.

It was his ill-conceived decision to remove fuel subsidies which has virtually brought the economy to its knees. His devaluation of the naira has led to an astronomical increase in the cost of living. Food and every day household items are becoming increasingly unaffordable. His draconian tax policies are creating a crisis of unemployment as companies are going bankrupt and others are relocating out of Nigeria. The instability of the economy is keeping foreign investors away from our shores.

True, about 60% of Nigerian governors are performing very poorly. Unfortunately for the country, these wasteful, greedy and unethical governors’ model themselves after the President; the nation’s leader. But even these unreliable governors cannot be held responsible for the state of the economy and the state of the country’s security as both critical areas of government are controlled from the center.

It is the Federal Government which coordinates the country’s economy by receiving revenue from states and redistributing it to them through the Federal Government’s distribution formula. It is not the Governors who control the Federation Account.

And it is the Federal Government which is responsible for the nation’s security through its control of the Army, the Navy, the Air Force as well as the police, not state Governors. Whether he likes it or not, President Tinubu has to be held responsible for Nigeria’s worsening economy and disastrous security situation.

And it is the Federal Government which is responsible for the nation’s security through its control of the Army, the Navy, the Air Force as well as the police, not state Governors. Whether he likes it or not, President Tinubu has to be held responsible for Nigeria’s worsening economy and disastrous security situation.

Also, President Tinubu cannot blame Governors for the aspect of bad governance which is reflected in his obnoxious lifestyle. He has only himself to blame if Nigerians condemn him for prioritizing his 150-billion-naira jet, his N1 billion cardilac, his N5 billion yacht, the N21 billion vote for refurbishing his Vice President’s lodge and several billion Naira approved for the First Lady’s travels over Education, Health, Transportation and agriculture.
Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse, PhD. Public Affairs Analyst and Convener Reset Lagos PDP and member PDP National Presidential Campaign Council (2023).

Columns

CHALLENGES OF TERRORISM REQUIRES HOLISTIC AND MULTIFACETED APPROACH- SENATOR GAIDAM

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The Honourable Minister of Police Affairs, Senator Ibrahim Gaidam has pointed out that addressing the challenge of terrorism requires a holistic and multifaceted approach among the security agencies
He stated this during the Stakeholders Conference on Security with a theme “A Path to Regional Cooperation” organized by the Ministry of Police Affairs in conjunction with the Nigeria Police Force and National Central Bureau (NCB) at the Rockview Hotels, Abuja.

Gaidam stated that implementing the International Standard and good practice of sound, modern, integrated, and cooperative border management will go a long way in putting an end to this threat.
He urged all stakeholders present at the conference to work collaboratively towards a shared vision of security. “We can overcome these challenges and emerge as a beacon of stability and progress in Africa if all hands are put on deck”. Gaidam stressed.
The Minister opined that the objective of this conference is to deliberate on the way forward to achieving a stable regional security thereby focusing on strategies to strengthen collaboration among Interpol member countries in West Africa with a view to fostering partnerships to share intelligence, expertise and approaches for combating trans-border crimes.

In his words, “Ladies and gentlemen, it is pertinent to state that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR has worked immensely to curb the insurgency caused by Boko Haram, Bandits and other transnational crimes. Some of these measures include biometric system at border checkpoint, integration of data analytics into border security operations and deployment of surveillance drones along critical border regions”.

Gaidam observed that despite Government’s efforts to end the menace of terrorism and violent extremism in the country, the threat posed by terrorism has risen significantly adding that Nigeria was ranked 6th most impacted country globally according to the 2024 Global Terrorism Index.

He enumerated Government to mitigating insecurity which include deploying the military, cooperating with international partners, implementing counter-terrorism legislation; adoption of a legal framework related to the West African Police Information System (WAPIS); provision of (WAPIS) terminals to allow security agencies access to critical information and Establishment of National Criminal Data Fusion Center (NCDFC) for the Nigerian Police Force.

In his goodwill message the Chairman Police Service Commission, DIG Hashimu Salisu (RTD) represented by Director Police Discipline, Ferdinand Uchechukwu Ekpe, stated that no nation can afford to stand alone in the face of threats and insurgency, noting that a secure and peaceful Nigerian state is necessary for a secure and prosperous West Africa and the entire ECOWAS market area.

Also, the Chairman, National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) Brigadier General Mohammed Buba Marwa (RTD) represented by Director Intelligence Kennedy Zirangey in his good will message states that, the conference came at the right time where the nation is faced with insecurity such as terrorism, banditry, insurgency, kidnapping, community conflicts and myriads of other security challenges adding that all the catalyst behind these insecurity threats is drug usage by the foot soldiers perpetrating these crimes.

Earlier, the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Adeolu, represented by Deputy Inspector General Logistics and Supplies DIG A. A. Hamzat, said that the convergence of illicit drugs, small arms, and light weapons in the hands of criminal elements continues to fuel organized crime and extremism, adding that weak border enforcement mechanisms. Fragmented intelligence sharing systems exacerbate the situation.

 

Continue Reading

Columns

Trump’s tariffs: Why won’t countries buy US meat products?

Published

on

What do US producers need to do? For the time being, US animal farming practices are either incompatible or too impractical to meet the food safety demands of export markets. Australia and Argentina are open to importing US beef, but US producers must meet their regulatory standards. For the UK and EU, it's a more difficult path, which would require US producers to cease using growth hormones in beef production and end the practice of chlorine washing in poultry. Polling data suggest Europeans are against allowing US meat products in — a 2020 poll found 80 per cent of the British public are against allowing imports of chlorinated chicken.
Spread the love

US President Donald Trump wants other countries to import more American beef and poultry. Several countries restrict importing these products for decades because they don’t meet their food safety regulations.

In an announcement on April 2, Trump called out Australian restrictions on US beef, saying: “We imported $3 billion of Australian beef from them just last year alone. They won’t take any of our beef.”

His administration also singled out the UK and EU for “non-science-based” restrictions on importing US beef, and Argentina for its ban of live US cattle exports.

Trump has used these import bans as part of his rationale to impose new trade tariffs.

Who do countries ban US beef imports?

There are different reasons why Australia, Argentina, the EU and the UK don’t import some American beef products.

For Australia and Argentina, the restrictions date back to 2003 when bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was detected in US cattle. BSE is a disease which affects the nervous system of cattle caused by misfolded proteins known as prions. It’s also known as Mad Cow Disease.

Humans can become infected with the disease when they eat meat contaminated with BSE. It is known as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. Globally, a total of 233 people have died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after eating BSE-infected.

US health authorities reduced the spread of BSE among US cattle sufficiently to see the ban on beef exports to Australia lifted in 2019.

“There may be a feeling from some producers or companies in the US that Australia is banning US beef, but there’s no ban in place,” said Robyn Alders, a veterinary scientist at the Australian National University.

But US imports are still restricted if they don’t meet Australia’s strict biosecurity laws. For US beef to be allowed into Australia, US cattle farmers must prove their cattle are entirely bred, grown and slaughtered in the US.

“To do that [tracing] in a way that would still make their product a cost-efficient thing to ship that product across to Australia, there are very few companies — virtually none at the moment — that are willing to take that on,” Alders said.

Argentina lifted its BSE ban on American beef products in 2018 but has maintained the restriction on live cattle imports until the two countries finalize a new “sanitary certificate”.

No added hormones for Europe and the UK

The EU and UK have restricted US beef imports since 1989 because the US cattle industry sometimes uses growth hormones to increase meat and milk yields. The EU does import non-hormone-treated beef from the US.

US dairy and cattle farmers routinely use hormones like estradiol 17ß and testosterone to promote faster growth and improve feed efficiency.

The EU’s ban rationale, which is also maintained by the UK post-Brexit, is based on its own scientific evaluation showing that daily intake of growth hormones can have negative health impacts, including evidence that estradiol 17ß can cause cancerous tumor growth.

The US cattle industry has argued against the EU’s restrictions, saying food safety testing in the US shows no risk to adult health.

“[However], the European perspective is that the entire population does not consist only of health adults, but [also] of infants, children, the elderly, the immunologically compromised,” said Erik Millstone, an expert in food and science policy at the University of Sussex, UK.

“EU authorities have done a much more comprehensive assessment of the risk of consuming hormone-treated beef [compared to US authorities],” Millstone said.

Chlorinated chicken banned in Europe too

The US has also criticized EU bans on importing US poultry that has been cleaned in chlorine.

US poultry farmers wash poultry meat in chlorine solutions to kill harmful bacteria such as campylobacter, which commonly causes food poisoning.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose a health risk for consumers.

However, European authorities are concerned that rinsing chicken in chlorine at the end of the food production process allows lower standards of hygiene and animal welfare in earlier stages. EU regulations legislate animal welfare at all stages of the “farm to fork” process.

Millstone also that some research shows that chlorine rinsing may not actually have the intended effect of decontaminating meat.

“The chlorinated water was not an effective disinfectant. The bacteria remained in place, remained pathogenic, remained dangerous, infectious, but were just not detected,” Millstone said.

As a result, rates of bacterial food poisoning in the US are substantially higher than they are in the European Union or UK, said Millstone.

What do US producers need to do?

For the time being, US animal farming practices are either incompatible or too impractical to meet the food safety demands of export markets.

Australia and Argentina are open to importing US beef, but US producers must meet their regulatory standards.

For the UK and EU, it’s a more difficult path, which would require US producers to cease using growth hormones in beef production and end the practice of chlorine washing in poultry.

Polling data suggest Europeans are against allowing US meat products in — a 2020 poll found 80 per cent of the British public are against allowing imports of chlorinated chicken.

Continue Reading

Columns

Afghan’s claim he is 140 years old is investigated by the Taliban

Published

on

Spread the love

The Taliban is investigating an Afghan man’s claim that he is 140 years old – which would make him the oldest person ever to have lived.

Aqel Nazir, who lives in the country’s eastern Khost province, says he was born in the 1880s.

He claims to remember celebrating the end of the Third Anglo-Afghan War in 1919 alongside King Amanullah Khan, the Afghan leader who launched a campaign against the British, while in his thirties.

Nazir, who lives in the picturesque hills in Khost, said: ‘I was in the palace with King Amanullah Khan.

‘I was over 30 at the time and I remember saying that the British had fled and knelt down.

‘Everyone was happy and thanked King Amanullah Khan for chasing the British away.

‘Many leaders accompanied us to the Arg [presidential palace], but now all of them have passed away.’

The great-great grandfather does not have any documents to support his claim, but his family are also on board with gaining official recognition of his status.

Aqel Nazir, who lives in the country’s eastern Khost province, says he was born in the 1880s

 

The ruling Taliban administration has dispatched a a special civil registration team to assess his true age

 

Khyal Wazir, his 50-year-old grandson, said: ‘He is my grandfather, and I have my grandchildren as well.’

Another grandson, Abdul Hakim Sabari, said: ‘We request the government confirm our grandfather’s age using an ID or any other scientific method or documents, to prove he is 140 years old.’

In an attempt to solve the mystery, the ruling Taliban administration has dispatched a a special civil registration team to assess his true age.

Mustaghfar Gurbaz, a Taliban spokesman for the province, said: ‘If confirmed by documents or assessments, we will work to register him as the oldest person in the world.’

If verified, he would comfortably take the title of the oldest person to have ever lived.

That record is held by Jeanne Calment, who was born in 1875 and passed away in 1997, 122 years later.

The world’s current verified oldest living person is Inah Canabarro Lucas, a Brazilian nun who turned 116 last June.

Another Brazilian woman,  Deolira Gliceria Pedro da Silva, is hoping to have her own claim to be 120 years of age verified by Guinness World Records.

But experts have already cast doubt on Nazir’s claims.

The world’s current verified oldest living person is Inah Canabarro Lucas

 

The Brazilian nun turned 116 last June

 

Valery Novoselov, a geriatrician at Moscow State University, told Russian outlet AIF: ‘There are no reliably registered men on the planet older than 114 to 115 years [of age].

‘In the Caucasus in the 60s, they also recorded “long-livers” – shepherds who allegedly lived to 168 years.

‘These are so-called games with age. There are no documents, no reliable data – which means this is an unrealistic picture.’

In 2015, a man claiming to be 100 years old applied for asylum in Germany after an extraordinary eight-month journey from Afghanistan.

Like Nazir, Abdul Qadir Azizi did not have any identity papers, but his family claimed his year of birth was 1905.

Azizi, who is deaf and blind, spent one month travelling across two continents from his home in the Afghan town of Baghlan to reach Germany.

His family fled after three of Azizi’s sons were killed by the Taliban.

The plight of the elderly in Afghanistan has worsened since the Taliban takeover.

In 2024, they effectively abolished the pension system, leaving many older Afghans struggling to meet basic needs.

Previously, anyone over the age of 65 received a monthly payment of around $100 from the state.

Read more

Continue Reading

Trending